HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Criminal Appeal1976

LAI SUI SHEUNG v. THE QUEEN

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR10/1992THE QUEEN v. WONG MOK DIN
  • CAAR11/1986THE QUEEN v. CHUNG WAI-YIU
  • CAAR12/1986THE QUEEN v. HSU SAI-MAN AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR15/1986THE QUEEN v. WU KAM MING AND OTHERS
  • CAAR15/1987THE QUEEN v. LEUNG WING FAI
  • CAAR16/1987THE QUEEN v. PANG CHEUNG KIM
  • CAAR19/1986THE QUEEN v. CHAN CHI MAN
  • CAAR22/1986THE QUEEN v. WONG TAK-CHI
  • CAAR23/1986THE QUEEN v. MA LAI WU AND OTHERS
  • CAAR4/1986THE QUEEN v. LY XUONG THANH
  • CAAR5/1986THE QUEEN v. YEUNG KAM-WAH (D1) AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR8/1986THE QUEEN v. ALBERT STANLEY MALIA
  • CAAR9/1986THE QUEEN v. CHU TAI WAI AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR9/1989THE QUEEN v. CHAN KOON KWOK ARTHUR
  • CACC1000/1976LAI FAT v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC1000/1983THE QUEEN v. LEE HEI KEUNG
  • CACC1001/1979LAW WAI-MING AND ANOTHER v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1972LIU KAM-MAN v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1973LO WAI KEUNG v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1977TAM YUK-MUI (F) v. THE QUEEN
1261-EN-1976-03-15

LAI SUI SHEUNG v. THE QUEEN

HTML content

CACC000157/1976

IN THE COURT OF APPEALCriminal Appeal
 1976 No.157

-----------------

 

BETWEEN:  
 LAI SUI SHEUNGAppellant
 and 
 THE QUEENRespondent

Coram: Briggs, C.J., Huggins & Pickering, JJ.A.

Date of Judgment: 15 MARCH 1976

 

-----------------

JUDGMENT

-----------------

 

1. The appellant pleaded guilty to (1) assault with intent to rob, (2) carrying arms without a licence and (3) carrying ammunition without a licence. He was sentenced to nine years' imprisonment on the first count and to seven years' imprisonment on the second and third counts, the sentences to run concurrently. He has appealed against these sentences.

2. The appellant entered the Wah Do Restaurant in Dundas Street, Kowloon at about 12.30 a.m. on the 24th September. He threatened the cashier with a revolver and ordered him to hand over the restaurant takings. The cashier opened up the cash drawer and then grabbed the barrel of the gun and forced the appellant to release it. The cashier then pointed the revolver at the appellant, ordering him to stand still. However, the appellant fled from the restaurant into the street. He was chased and caught a few minutes later.

3. The appellant has two previous convictions: one for robbery in 1971 for which he was bound over for twelve months, and one for theft in 1974 for which he received a sentence of six months' imprisonment.

4. Although this was a genuine revolver and although armed robbery is a very serious offence, we think that the sentences in this particular case were too high.

5. We think that justice would best be done if the sentences are each reduced by two years so that the appellant will serve seven years' imprisonment on the first count and five years' each on the second and third counts, all sentences to be concurrent.

  

  

 (Geoffrey Briggs)
 President.

  

Representation:

Appellant in person.

Miss Kam for crown.