HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Criminal Appeal1976

TSANG CHEUNG-KWONG @ MOR LO v. THE QUEEN

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR10/1992THE QUEEN v. WONG MOK DIN
  • CAAR11/1986THE QUEEN v. CHUNG WAI-YIU
  • CAAR12/1986THE QUEEN v. HSU SAI-MAN AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR15/1986THE QUEEN v. WU KAM MING AND OTHERS
  • CAAR15/1987THE QUEEN v. LEUNG WING FAI
  • CAAR16/1987THE QUEEN v. PANG CHEUNG KIM
  • CAAR19/1986THE QUEEN v. CHAN CHI MAN
  • CAAR22/1986THE QUEEN v. WONG TAK-CHI
  • CAAR23/1986THE QUEEN v. MA LAI WU AND OTHERS
  • CAAR4/1986THE QUEEN v. LY XUONG THANH
  • CAAR5/1986THE QUEEN v. YEUNG KAM-WAH (D1) AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR8/1986THE QUEEN v. ALBERT STANLEY MALIA
  • CAAR9/1986THE QUEEN v. CHU TAI WAI AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR9/1989THE QUEEN v. CHAN KOON KWOK ARTHUR
  • CACC1000/1976LAI FAT v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC1000/1983THE QUEEN v. LEE HEI KEUNG
  • CACC1001/1979LAW WAI-MING AND ANOTHER v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1972LIU KAM-MAN v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1973LO WAI KEUNG v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1977TAM YUK-MUI (F) v. THE QUEEN
1582-EN-1976-03-04

TSANG CHEUNG-KWONG @ MOR LO v. THE QUEEN

HTML content

CACC000188/1976

  

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF HONG KONG

(APPELLATE JURISDICTION)

  

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 188 OF 1976

-----------------

  

BETWEEN:  
 TSANG CHEUNG-KWONG @ MOR LOAppellant
 and 
 THE QUEENRespondent

Coram: Briggs, C.J., Huggins & Pickering, JJ.A.

Date of Judgment: 4th March, 1976.

 

-----------------

JUDGMENT

-----------------

 

1. The appellant pleaded guilty to one offence of robbery contrary to section 10 of the Theft Ordinance. He was sentenced to three and a half years' imprisonment. The appellant appeals against his sentence.

2. The facts are that the appellant, together with three other men hustled a young man and a young woman as the latter were returning home at about midnight on the 11th December last. One of the Chinese males had a penknife. The victims were threatened and a watch was taken together with $55 from the male victim. The four robbers fled. After they had gone, the victims returned to their homes but this matter was not reported by them to the police. About three weeks' later the appellant phoned the C.I.D. at Aberdeen Police Station and said he wished to give himself up for this offence. The appellant has been in trouble before and his record includes one offence of robbery for which he was sentenced to serve a term in a detention centre.

3. This is one of those rarest cases where an appellant against whom nothing could be proved, voluntarily gave himself up to the police, expressing the fact that he regretted that which he had done.

4. We think, in the circumstances, that the period of 3 ½ years is too great a sentence for this offence and so we will allow the appeal to the extent that the sentence of 3 ½ years is reduced to one of 2 ½ years.

  

  

 (Geoffrey Briggs)
 President.

  

Representation:

Appellant in person.

Caird for crown.