HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Criminal Appeal1976

YU SHING-HOI v. THE QUEEN

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR10/1992THE QUEEN v. WONG MOK DIN
  • CAAR11/1986THE QUEEN v. CHUNG WAI-YIU
  • CAAR12/1986THE QUEEN v. HSU SAI-MAN AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR15/1986THE QUEEN v. WU KAM MING AND OTHERS
  • CAAR15/1987THE QUEEN v. LEUNG WING FAI
  • CAAR16/1987THE QUEEN v. PANG CHEUNG KIM
  • CAAR19/1986THE QUEEN v. CHAN CHI MAN
  • CAAR22/1986THE QUEEN v. WONG TAK-CHI
  • CAAR23/1986THE QUEEN v. MA LAI WU AND OTHERS
  • CAAR4/1986THE QUEEN v. LY XUONG THANH
  • CAAR5/1986THE QUEEN v. YEUNG KAM-WAH (D1) AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR8/1986THE QUEEN v. ALBERT STANLEY MALIA
  • CAAR9/1986THE QUEEN v. CHU TAI WAI AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR9/1989THE QUEEN v. CHAN KOON KWOK ARTHUR
  • CACC1000/1976LAI FAT v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC1000/1983THE QUEEN v. LEE HEI KEUNG
  • CACC1001/1979LAW WAI-MING AND ANOTHER v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1972LIU KAM-MAN v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1973LO WAI KEUNG v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1977TAM YUK-MUI (F) v. THE QUEEN
7199-EN-1976-08-18

YU SHING-HOI v. THE QUEEN

HTML content

CACC000826/1976

  

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HONG KONG

(APPELLATE JURISDICTION)

  

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 826 OF 1976

-----------------

 

BETWEEN  
 YU Shing-hoiAppellant
 and 
 THE QUEENRespondent

-----------------

Coram: Cons J.

Date of Judgment: 18th August, 1976.

  

-----------------

JUDGMENT

-----------------

  

1. The appellant was sentenced to nine months' imprisonment for possession of dangerous drugs. That was a perfectly proper sentence. However, a few days before it was passed the appellant was sentenced in another court to thirty months' imprisonment. The aggregate will thus amount to thirty-nine months less a few days. This is in excess of the maximum of three years prescribed by sec. 57 of the Magistrates Ordinance. I, therefore, propose to reduce the sentence from nine months to six months.

  

Representation:

Appellant in person.

William Li, Crown Counsel, for the respondent.