HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Criminal Appeal1977

LEE YUK-LAN (F) v. THE QUEEN

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR10/1992THE QUEEN v. WONG MOK DIN
  • CAAR11/1986THE QUEEN v. CHUNG WAI-YIU
  • CAAR12/1986THE QUEEN v. HSU SAI-MAN AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR15/1986THE QUEEN v. WU KAM MING AND OTHERS
  • CAAR15/1987THE QUEEN v. LEUNG WING FAI
  • CAAR16/1987THE QUEEN v. PANG CHEUNG KIM
  • CAAR19/1986THE QUEEN v. CHAN CHI MAN
  • CAAR22/1986THE QUEEN v. WONG TAK-CHI
  • CAAR23/1986THE QUEEN v. MA LAI WU AND OTHERS
  • CAAR4/1986THE QUEEN v. LY XUONG THANH
  • CAAR5/1986THE QUEEN v. YEUNG KAM-WAH (D1) AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR8/1986THE QUEEN v. ALBERT STANLEY MALIA
  • CAAR9/1986THE QUEEN v. CHU TAI WAI AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR9/1989THE QUEEN v. CHAN KOON KWOK ARTHUR
  • CACC1000/1976LAI FAT v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC1000/1983THE QUEEN v. LEE HEI KEUNG
  • CACC1001/1979LAW WAI-MING AND ANOTHER v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1972LIU KAM-MAN v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1973LO WAI KEUNG v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1977TAM YUK-MUI (F) v. THE QUEEN
394-EN-1977-10-24

LEE YUK-LAN (F) v. THE QUEEN

HTML content

CACC001012/1977

 

IN THE SUPREME COURTCriminal Appeal
 1977 No.1012

 

BETWEEN:  
 LEE Yuk-lan (F)Appellant
 and 
 THE QUEENRespondent

Coram: Briggs, C.J., Pickering, J.A. and Leonard, J.

Date of Judgment: 24th October, 1977.

 

-----------------

JUDGMENT

-----------------

 

1. The appellant pleaded guilty to three offences of possession of dangerous drugs, in this case opium, for the purpose of unlawful trafficking and to two offences of being in possession of an opium pipe. She was sentenced to sentences of three and a half years' imprisonment on each of the possession charges and to one year on each of the charges concerning the opium pipes. All the sentences were ordered to be served concurrently.

2. The appellant, who is a woman, has five children. Shortly after the birth of the youngest of these children, her husband deserted her. She then succumbed to the temptation of allowing her flat to be used as a place to store a considerable quantity of opium and opium dross and two opium pipes. It was not suggested that she was keeping her flat as a divan.

3. Counsel, who appeared for the appellant, pointed out the unfortunate circumstances concerning the commission of this offence. He also referred to the fact that the courts considered possession of opium in a very different way from possession of other dangerous drugs.

4. We think that the total sentence of three and a half years for possession of what amounted to some two pounds of opium in the particular circumstances of this case is an excessive sentence and we allowed the appeal to the extent that a sentence of two and a half years' imprisonment will be substituted for each of the sentences of three and a half years passed on the appellant. The sentences are to be served concurrently.

 

 

 (Geoffrey Briggs)
 President.

 

Representation:

Goodbody (Alfred Lau & Co.) for appellant.

Boase for the Crown/Respondent.