HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Criminal Appeal1977

LI SHU-CHUNG v. THE QUEEN

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR10/1992THE QUEEN v. WONG MOK DIN
  • CAAR11/1986THE QUEEN v. CHUNG WAI-YIU
  • CAAR12/1986THE QUEEN v. HSU SAI-MAN AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR15/1986THE QUEEN v. WU KAM MING AND OTHERS
  • CAAR15/1987THE QUEEN v. LEUNG WING FAI
  • CAAR16/1987THE QUEEN v. PANG CHEUNG KIM
  • CAAR19/1986THE QUEEN v. CHAN CHI MAN
  • CAAR22/1986THE QUEEN v. WONG TAK-CHI
  • CAAR23/1986THE QUEEN v. MA LAI WU AND OTHERS
  • CAAR4/1986THE QUEEN v. LY XUONG THANH
  • CAAR5/1986THE QUEEN v. YEUNG KAM-WAH (D1) AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR8/1986THE QUEEN v. ALBERT STANLEY MALIA
  • CAAR9/1986THE QUEEN v. CHU TAI WAI AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR9/1989THE QUEEN v. CHAN KOON KWOK ARTHUR
  • CACC1000/1976LAI FAT v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC1000/1983THE QUEEN v. LEE HEI KEUNG
  • CACC1001/1979LAW WAI-MING AND ANOTHER v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1972LIU KAM-MAN v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1973LO WAI KEUNG v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1977TAM YUK-MUI (F) v. THE QUEEN
428-EN-1977-10-01

LI SHU-CHUNG v. THE QUEEN

HTML content

CACC001026/1977

 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF HONG KONG

(Appellate Jurisdiction)

 

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1026 OF 1977

-----------------

 

BETWEEN
LI Shu-chungAppellant
 and 
 The QueenRespondent

-----------------

Coram: O'Connor, J. in Court

Date of Judgment: 1st October, 1977

 

-----------------

JUDGMENT

-----------------

 

1. The appellant was convicted on his pleas of guilty to a charge of possession of syringes being articles fit and intended for the injection of dangerous drugs and a charge of possession of dangerous drugs. It is unnecessary to recite the facts in any detail. The appellant who was a drug addict with numerous convictions of the type usual in such cases, was found with syringes and drugs all obviously intended for his own use. The learned magistrate sentenced him to three months imprisonment on each charge and ordered them to run consecutively making an effective total of 6 months. I consider that no complaint can be made about the total length of sentence but that it ought to have been achieved by two sentences of six months each to run concurrently as the offences are closely connected in time, similar in character and complementary to each other.

 

 

 (R. O'Connor)
 Judge of the High Court

 

Representation:

Appellant in person

Chandler, C.C., for Crown/Respondent.