HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Criminal Appeal1977

LAM SHUK-YUK (F) (ON BAIL) v. THE QUEEN

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR10/1992THE QUEEN v. WONG MOK DIN
  • CAAR11/1986THE QUEEN v. CHUNG WAI-YIU
  • CAAR12/1986THE QUEEN v. HSU SAI-MAN AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR15/1986THE QUEEN v. WU KAM MING AND OTHERS
  • CAAR15/1987THE QUEEN v. LEUNG WING FAI
  • CAAR16/1987THE QUEEN v. PANG CHEUNG KIM
  • CAAR19/1986THE QUEEN v. CHAN CHI MAN
  • CAAR22/1986THE QUEEN v. WONG TAK-CHI
  • CAAR23/1986THE QUEEN v. MA LAI WU AND OTHERS
  • CAAR4/1986THE QUEEN v. LY XUONG THANH
  • CAAR5/1986THE QUEEN v. YEUNG KAM-WAH (D1) AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR8/1986THE QUEEN v. ALBERT STANLEY MALIA
  • CAAR9/1986THE QUEEN v. CHU TAI WAI AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR9/1989THE QUEEN v. CHAN KOON KWOK ARTHUR
  • CACC1000/1976LAI FAT v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC1000/1983THE QUEEN v. LEE HEI KEUNG
  • CACC1001/1979LAW WAI-MING AND ANOTHER v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1972LIU KAM-MAN v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1973LO WAI KEUNG v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1977TAM YUK-MUI (F) v. THE QUEEN
471-EN-1977-02-12

LAM SHUK-YUK (F) (ON BAIL) v. THE QUEEN

HTML content

CACC000105/1977

 

IN THE SUPREME COURTCriminal Appeal
1977 No. 105

 

BETWEEN:  
 LAM Shuk-yuk (F) (on bail)Appellant
 and 
 THE QUEENRespondent

Coram: Briggs, C.J.

Date of Judgment: 12th February, 1977.

 

-----------------

JUDGMENT

-----------------

 

1. The appellant is a Chinese woman, aged 25 years. On the 21st October, 1976, she stole four packages of Brands Essence of Chicken and one packet of peanut-sweets from a supermarket. She was caught red-handed and charged with the offence of theft.

2. On her appearance before the magistrate, it was noticed that she was in the last stages of pregnancy. She pleaded guilty to the offence of theft and the magistrate remanded the case for sentence until a date in early January. She was on bail. On the 7th January, 1977 the magistrate sentenced her to one month's imprisonment. The child of the appellant had, by that time, been born a few weeks before. The appellant appeals against her sentence.

3. In the circumstances of this case, I think that the magistrate did not take into account sufficiently her condition at the time that the theft occurred. The circumstances of the theft were amateur and the appellant was in the last month of pregnancy. The proper order to be made is that the appeal is allowed to the extent that the sentence shall be suspended for eighteen months.

 

 

 (Geoffrey Briggs)
 Chief Justice.

 

Representation: 

K. John Cheung (Clayton Wong & Co.) for Appellant.

Lucas for the Crown/Respondent.