HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Criminal Appeal1977

FAN KIN-CHUEN v. THE QUEEN

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR10/1992THE QUEEN v. WONG MOK DIN
  • CAAR11/1986THE QUEEN v. CHUNG WAI-YIU
  • CAAR12/1986THE QUEEN v. HSU SAI-MAN AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR15/1986THE QUEEN v. WU KAM MING AND OTHERS
  • CAAR15/1987THE QUEEN v. LEUNG WING FAI
  • CAAR16/1987THE QUEEN v. PANG CHEUNG KIM
  • CAAR19/1986THE QUEEN v. CHAN CHI MAN
  • CAAR22/1986THE QUEEN v. WONG TAK-CHI
  • CAAR23/1986THE QUEEN v. MA LAI WU AND OTHERS
  • CAAR4/1986THE QUEEN v. LY XUONG THANH
  • CAAR5/1986THE QUEEN v. YEUNG KAM-WAH (D1) AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR8/1986THE QUEEN v. ALBERT STANLEY MALIA
  • CAAR9/1986THE QUEEN v. CHU TAI WAI AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR9/1989THE QUEEN v. CHAN KOON KWOK ARTHUR
  • CACC1000/1976LAI FAT v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC1000/1983THE QUEEN v. LEE HEI KEUNG
  • CACC1001/1979LAW WAI-MING AND ANOTHER v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1972LIU KAM-MAN v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1973LO WAI KEUNG v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1977TAM YUK-MUI (F) v. THE QUEEN
4889-EN-1977-05-31

FAN KIN-CHUEN v. THE QUEEN

HTML content

CACC000499/1977

 

IN THE SUPREME COURT 
 Criminal Appeal
 1977 No. 499

 

BETWEEN  
 FAN Kin-chuenAppellant
 and 
 The QueenRespondent

-----------------

Coram: McMullin, J.

Date of Judgment: 31 May 1977

 

-----------------

JUDGMENT

-----------------

 

1. The appeal against conviction was dismissed in this case. Leave to appeal out of time against sentence was given, Mr. Marash for the Crown not opposing. The appellant is 29 years of age and this is his first offence. The amount of the drugs seized is minimal and was found in two small plastic phials in a drawer in a room which, though no doubt nominally in his occupation, is not a room where he regularly co-habits with his wife since they are living on terms of partial estrangement and it is not contested that he normally resides with his aunt. In the circumstances it is possible - although the defendant's defence was total denial of possession - that the phials with the traces may have been there for a considerable time and may simply have been overlooked by the defendant and not disposed of. They may, that is to say, figure as something in his past for which, though he remains accountable, it would be unfair to punish him on the basis of a contemporary misdeed. It is in taking this merciful view - and in view of clear record and the needs of his family - that I suspended the sentence and not because I regard six months for possession of heroin as manifestly excessive or wrong in principle even for a first offender. Order: Sentence suspended for two years.

 

 

 (A.M. McMullin)

 

Representation: