HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Criminal Appeal1977

YIP SHUT v. THE QUEEN

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR10/1992THE QUEEN v. WONG MOK DIN
  • CAAR11/1986THE QUEEN v. CHUNG WAI-YIU
  • CAAR12/1986THE QUEEN v. HSU SAI-MAN AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR15/1986THE QUEEN v. WU KAM MING AND OTHERS
  • CAAR15/1987THE QUEEN v. LEUNG WING FAI
  • CAAR16/1987THE QUEEN v. PANG CHEUNG KIM
  • CAAR19/1986THE QUEEN v. CHAN CHI MAN
  • CAAR22/1986THE QUEEN v. WONG TAK-CHI
  • CAAR23/1986THE QUEEN v. MA LAI WU AND OTHERS
  • CAAR4/1986THE QUEEN v. LY XUONG THANH
  • CAAR5/1986THE QUEEN v. YEUNG KAM-WAH (D1) AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR8/1986THE QUEEN v. ALBERT STANLEY MALIA
  • CAAR9/1986THE QUEEN v. CHU TAI WAI AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR9/1989THE QUEEN v. CHAN KOON KWOK ARTHUR
  • CACC1000/1976LAI FAT v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC1000/1983THE QUEEN v. LEE HEI KEUNG
  • CACC1001/1979LAW WAI-MING AND ANOTHER v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1972LIU KAM-MAN v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1973LO WAI KEUNG v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1977TAM YUK-MUI (F) v. THE QUEEN
6375-EN-1977-07-23

YIP SHUT v. THE QUEEN

HTML content

CACC000665/1977

  

IN THE SUPREME COURTCriminal Appeal
 1977 No. 665

  

BETWEEN:  
 YIP ShutAppellant
 and 
 THE QUEENRespondent

Coram: Briggs, C.J.

Date of Judgment: 23rd July, 1977.

  

-----------------

JUDGMENT

-----------------

  

1. The appellant pleaded guilty to driving a public car carelessly on February 5th, 1977. He was sentenced to a fine of $150 and disqualified for a period of one year, the disqualification to apply to all types of vehicles. The magistrate ordered the disqualification to be suspended pending the determination of this appeal.

2. The appellant knocked down two girl pedestrians who were crossing a road. The accident occurred at about 8.10 p.m. The street was well-lit at the time and the pedestrians were on a pedestrian stud crossing.

3. The appellant has a record of previous convictions for traffic offences. They include one for dangerous and one for careless driving and three for driving without third party insurance. All those cases occurred during the last few years.

4. I think that the magistrate was in some doubt as to the appropriate period of disqualification otherwise he would not have suspended his order until the determination of this appeal. In my view, taking into consideration that the appellant earns his living by driving, a period of six months' disqualification is adequate. I therefore allow the appeal to the extent that the period of disqualification should be six months and not twelve months and that period will commence to-day.

   

  

 (Geoffrey Briggs)
 Chief Justice.

  

Representation:

Appellant in person.

Adams for crown.