HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Criminal Appeal1978

CHEUK CHI-KEUNG v. THE QUEEN

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR10/1992THE QUEEN v. WONG MOK DIN
  • CAAR11/1986THE QUEEN v. CHUNG WAI-YIU
  • CAAR12/1986THE QUEEN v. HSU SAI-MAN AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR15/1986THE QUEEN v. WU KAM MING AND OTHERS
  • CAAR15/1987THE QUEEN v. LEUNG WING FAI
  • CAAR16/1987THE QUEEN v. PANG CHEUNG KIM
  • CAAR19/1986THE QUEEN v. CHAN CHI MAN
  • CAAR22/1986THE QUEEN v. WONG TAK-CHI
  • CAAR23/1986THE QUEEN v. MA LAI WU AND OTHERS
  • CAAR4/1986THE QUEEN v. LY XUONG THANH
  • CAAR5/1986THE QUEEN v. YEUNG KAM-WAH (D1) AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR8/1986THE QUEEN v. ALBERT STANLEY MALIA
  • CAAR9/1986THE QUEEN v. CHU TAI WAI AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR9/1989THE QUEEN v. CHAN KOON KWOK ARTHUR
  • CACC1000/1976LAI FAT v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC1000/1983THE QUEEN v. LEE HEI KEUNG
  • CACC1001/1979LAW WAI-MING AND ANOTHER v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1972LIU KAM-MAN v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1973LO WAI KEUNG v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1977TAM YUK-MUI (F) v. THE QUEEN
412-EN-1978-02-25

CHEUK CHI-KEUNG v. THE QUEEN

HTML content

CACC000102/1978

 

IN THE SUPREME COURTCriminal Appeal
 1978 No. 102

 

BETWEEN:  
 CHEUK CHI-KEUNGAppellant
 and 
 THE QUEENRespondent

Coram: Briggs, C.J.

Date of Judgment: 25th February, 1978.

 

-----------------

JUDGMENT

-----------------

 

1. The appellant, the driver of a public light bus, pleaded guilty in the court below to the charge of careless driving. He was convicted and fined $450. He was also disqualified from driving all vehicles for three months. He appealed against his conviction. He was not interested in the fine of $450 which, in my opinion, is a heavy fine but he was interested in the order for disqualification.

2. The act of careless driving consisted of pulling out from a pavement without looking properly which caused his public light bus to come in contact with another vehicle. No one was injured.

3. This is not a very serious offence of careless driving. The appellant has been licensed to drive since 1963 and has been a driver of a public light bus for several years. He appears to have had one previous conviction for careless driving and another conviction for some minor motoring offence. The fines imposed on those two occasions show that in neither case was the offence serious.

4. In the circumstances, I think the sentence of disqualification was an excessive punishment for the offence in question. So I ordered that the order for disqualification be set aside and to allow the appeal to that extent.

 

 

 (Geoffrey Briggs)
 Chief Justice.

 

Representation:

Appellant in person

Duncan for crown/respondent