HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Criminal Appeal1978

LAM WA-HEUNG v. THE QUEEN

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR10/1992THE QUEEN v. WONG MOK DIN
  • CAAR11/1986THE QUEEN v. CHUNG WAI-YIU
  • CAAR12/1986THE QUEEN v. HSU SAI-MAN AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR15/1986THE QUEEN v. WU KAM MING AND OTHERS
  • CAAR15/1987THE QUEEN v. LEUNG WING FAI
  • CAAR16/1987THE QUEEN v. PANG CHEUNG KIM
  • CAAR19/1986THE QUEEN v. CHAN CHI MAN
  • CAAR22/1986THE QUEEN v. WONG TAK-CHI
  • CAAR23/1986THE QUEEN v. MA LAI WU AND OTHERS
  • CAAR4/1986THE QUEEN v. LY XUONG THANH
  • CAAR5/1986THE QUEEN v. YEUNG KAM-WAH (D1) AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR8/1986THE QUEEN v. ALBERT STANLEY MALIA
  • CAAR9/1986THE QUEEN v. CHU TAI WAI AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR9/1989THE QUEEN v. CHAN KOON KWOK ARTHUR
  • CACC1000/1976LAI FAT v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC1000/1983THE QUEEN v. LEE HEI KEUNG
  • CACC1001/1979LAW WAI-MING AND ANOTHER v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1972LIU KAM-MAN v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1973LO WAI KEUNG v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1977TAM YUK-MUI (F) v. THE QUEEN
1102-EN-1978-04-19

LAM WA-HEUNG v. THE QUEEN

HTML content

CACC000143/1978

 

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL 
on appeal from the District Court 
  
 1978 No. 143
 (Criminal)

-----------------

 

BETWEEN  
 LAM WA-HEUNGAppellant
 and 
 THE QUEENRespondent

-----------------

Coram: Briggs, C.J., Huggins & Pickering, JJ.A.

Date of Judgment: 19th April, 1978.

 

-----------------

JUDGMENT

-----------------

 

Pickering, J.A.:

1. The appellant, who is twenty-seven years old and who has one previous conviction for robbery, appeals against sentences totalling six years' imprisonment in respect of five robberies of taxi-drivers all of which took place within a period of less than three weeks.

2. The appellant's invariable technique was to board a taxi and ask to be driven to, or to the vincinity of, the Lok Man Estate and thereafter, during the course of the ride, to produce though not to use except to threaten, a knife. In each case the driver was robbed of cash and a watch and in one instance a finger-ring.

3. Upon his pleas of guilty the learned judge sentenced the appellant to two years' imprisonment concurrent on the second and third charges, two years' imprisonment, but consecutive to the earlier term of two years, on the third and fourth charges and to a further term of two years, again consecutive, on the first charge.

4. Whilst taxi-drivers are notoriously vulnerable to this type of offence and are entitled to the protection of the Courts, we consider that a total of six years' imprisonment for these offences, four of which would never have been laid at the appellant's door had he not volunteered the information about them, was somewhat too high and we reduced the total term of imprisonment from six years to five by substituting for the term of two years' imprisonment in respect of the first charge, a term of one year. 

 

Representation:

Appellant in person.

Aiken for Crown/respondent.