HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Criminal Appeal1978

LAM KIM-SANG v. THE QUEEN

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR10/1992THE QUEEN v. WONG MOK DIN
  • CAAR11/1986THE QUEEN v. CHUNG WAI-YIU
  • CAAR12/1986THE QUEEN v. HSU SAI-MAN AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR15/1986THE QUEEN v. WU KAM MING AND OTHERS
  • CAAR15/1987THE QUEEN v. LEUNG WING FAI
  • CAAR16/1987THE QUEEN v. PANG CHEUNG KIM
  • CAAR19/1986THE QUEEN v. CHAN CHI MAN
  • CAAR22/1986THE QUEEN v. WONG TAK-CHI
  • CAAR23/1986THE QUEEN v. MA LAI WU AND OTHERS
  • CAAR4/1986THE QUEEN v. LY XUONG THANH
  • CAAR5/1986THE QUEEN v. YEUNG KAM-WAH (D1) AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR8/1986THE QUEEN v. ALBERT STANLEY MALIA
  • CAAR9/1986THE QUEEN v. CHU TAI WAI AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR9/1989THE QUEEN v. CHAN KOON KWOK ARTHUR
  • CACC1000/1976LAI FAT v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC1000/1983THE QUEEN v. LEE HEI KEUNG
  • CACC1001/1979LAW WAI-MING AND ANOTHER v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1972LIU KAM-MAN v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1973LO WAI KEUNG v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1977TAM YUK-MUI (F) v. THE QUEEN
2370-EN-1978-04-29

LAM KIM-SANG v. THE QUEEN

HTML content

CACC000260/1978

 

IN THE SUPREME COURT 
 Criminal Appeal
 1978 No. 260

  

BETWEEN:  
 LAM Kim-sangAppellant
 and 
 THE QUEENRespondent

Coram: Briggs, C.J.

Date of Judgment: 29th April, 1978.

 

-----------------

JUDGMENT

-----------------

 

1. The appellant was found guilty of being a suspected person found loitering and sentenced to one month's imprisonment. I dismissed his appeal against conviction. The appellant was on bail Pending the hearing of the appeal and had served nine days of his sentence before bail was granted.

2. The appellant is a man of good character and apart from a traffic offence has a clear record. The offence was not one of a very serious nature and, in my view, it would have been better had a suspended sentence, or a non-custodial sentence even, been imposed.

3. In the event, I think justice would best be done if the appeal against sentence was allowed to the extent that the sentence be reduced so as to enable the appellant to be released on the date of the hearing of the appeal.

 

 

 (Geoffrey Briggs)
 Chief Justice.

 

Representation:

P.Nguyen (R.Tang & Co.,) for Appellant

Ingham for Crown