HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Criminal Appeal1978

LEUNG SHING v. THE QUEEN

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR10/1992THE QUEEN v. WONG MOK DIN
  • CAAR11/1986THE QUEEN v. CHUNG WAI-YIU
  • CAAR12/1986THE QUEEN v. HSU SAI-MAN AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR15/1986THE QUEEN v. WU KAM MING AND OTHERS
  • CAAR15/1987THE QUEEN v. LEUNG WING FAI
  • CAAR16/1987THE QUEEN v. PANG CHEUNG KIM
  • CAAR19/1986THE QUEEN v. CHAN CHI MAN
  • CAAR22/1986THE QUEEN v. WONG TAK-CHI
  • CAAR23/1986THE QUEEN v. MA LAI WU AND OTHERS
  • CAAR4/1986THE QUEEN v. LY XUONG THANH
  • CAAR5/1986THE QUEEN v. YEUNG KAM-WAH (D1) AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR8/1986THE QUEEN v. ALBERT STANLEY MALIA
  • CAAR9/1986THE QUEEN v. CHU TAI WAI AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR9/1989THE QUEEN v. CHAN KOON KWOK ARTHUR
  • CACC1000/1976LAI FAT v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC1000/1983THE QUEEN v. LEE HEI KEUNG
  • CACC1001/1979LAW WAI-MING AND ANOTHER v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1972LIU KAM-MAN v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1973LO WAI KEUNG v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1977TAM YUK-MUI (F) v. THE QUEEN
3578-EN-1978-09-06

LEUNG SHING v. THE QUEEN

HTML content

CACC000370/1978

 

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL 
on appeal from the High Court 
  
 1978 No. 370
 (Criminal)

-----------------

 

BETWEEN  
 LEUNG ShingAppellant
 and 
 THE QUEENRespondent

Coram: Pickering, Ag. C.J. , McMullin and Yang, JJ.

Date of Judgment: 6th September, 1978.

 

-----------------

JUDGMENT

-----------------

 

Pickering, Ag. C.J.:

1. The appellant, who is aged 60 or 61 and who has a problem of alcoholism, pleaded guilty to the manslaughter of his wife and was sentenced to six years' imprisonment against which sentence he now appeals.

2. The killing took place at about noon when the appellant had already imbibed four or five taels of a Chinese spirit called Sam Tsing. At that time he and his wife were apparently watching television when a dispute arose about the television set which led to the wife claiming that the appellant had not really been taking care of the family and that he had been in Castle Peak for "goodness knows how long". It is the fact that the appellant had been receiving treatment in Castle Peak Hospital for his alcoholism for up to six months every year since 1968. He retorted to his wife that the only reason that he had been to Castle Peak was that she called the police to take his there six or seven times a year to which the wife replied "Well what are you going to do about it? If you do not like it, here, take this chopper, you can chop me up." At this stage the wife attacked the appellant with her crutch whereupon the appellant grabbed the chopper and chopped the deceased on the neck from which wound or wounds she died.

3. The assessment of sentence in cases of manslaughter is notoriously difficult and the range runs from probation to life imprisonment. We were referred to certain precedents of sentences in cases of manslaughter not all of which were in point but upon careful consideration we are of the view that the sentence of six years' imprisonment was, in the circumstances, too severe and we allow the application, set aside that sentence and substitute for it a sentence of three years' imprisonment.

  

Representation:

R. Kotewall (Director of Legal Aid) for appellant.

A. Hodge for Crown/respondent.