HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Criminal Appeal1978

LEUNG TIM v. THE QUEEN

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR10/1992THE QUEEN v. WONG MOK DIN
  • CAAR11/1986THE QUEEN v. CHUNG WAI-YIU
  • CAAR12/1986THE QUEEN v. HSU SAI-MAN AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR15/1986THE QUEEN v. WU KAM MING AND OTHERS
  • CAAR15/1987THE QUEEN v. LEUNG WING FAI
  • CAAR16/1987THE QUEEN v. PANG CHEUNG KIM
  • CAAR19/1986THE QUEEN v. CHAN CHI MAN
  • CAAR22/1986THE QUEEN v. WONG TAK-CHI
  • CAAR23/1986THE QUEEN v. MA LAI WU AND OTHERS
  • CAAR4/1986THE QUEEN v. LY XUONG THANH
  • CAAR5/1986THE QUEEN v. YEUNG KAM-WAH (D1) AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR8/1986THE QUEEN v. ALBERT STANLEY MALIA
  • CAAR9/1986THE QUEEN v. CHU TAI WAI AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR9/1989THE QUEEN v. CHAN KOON KWOK ARTHUR
  • CACC1000/1976LAI FAT v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC1000/1983THE QUEEN v. LEE HEI KEUNG
  • CACC1001/1979LAW WAI-MING AND ANOTHER v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1972LIU KAM-MAN v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1973LO WAI KEUNG v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1977TAM YUK-MUI (F) v. THE QUEEN
4378-EN-1978-06-22

LEUNG TIM v. THE QUEEN

HTML content

CACC000447/1978

 

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL1978 No. 447
 (Criminal)

BETWEEN:  
 LEUNG TIMAppellant
 and 
 THE QUEENRespondent

Coram: Briggs, C.J., Huggins & Pickering, JJ.A.

Date of Judgment: 22nd June, 1978.

 

-----------------

JUDGMENT

-----------------

 

1. The appellant pleaded guilty to one charge of attempted robbery and to one charge of being in possession of an offensive weapon in a public place. He was sentenced to five years on the first charge and to one year on the second charge, the sentences to be concurrent. The appellant appealed against his sentences.

2. The police have been worried about a spate of robberies in the area of Flower Market Road, Mongkok. Consequently, on the 29th January, this year, the police laid an ambush. Two members of the Force pretended to be a courting couple and another police officer waited a short distance away. The appellant, and another man, who was his co-defendant, approached the couple and attempted to rob them. The appellant produced a knife and threatened the supposed courting couple. The police then revealed who they were and arrested the appellant. It is not surprising that in those circumstances the appellant pleaded guilty.

3. However, we think that a sentence of five years for an attempted robbery of this nature is too high. The appellant has previous convictions of a minor nature but they do include two convictions of robbery and one of being in possession of an offensive weapon in a public place. Indeed, the appellant had been out of prison for those offences for one and a half months when he committed the present offence.

4. In the event, we think that justice would best be done if we reduced the sentence of five years' imprisonment to one of four years, and we so order accordingly.

 

 

 (Chief Justice)
 President.

 

Representation:

Appellant in person

White for crown/respondent