HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Criminal Appeal1978

KWOK YEW-LAM v. THE QUEEN

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR10/1992THE QUEEN v. WONG MOK DIN
  • CAAR11/1986THE QUEEN v. CHUNG WAI-YIU
  • CAAR12/1986THE QUEEN v. HSU SAI-MAN AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR15/1986THE QUEEN v. WU KAM MING AND OTHERS
  • CAAR15/1987THE QUEEN v. LEUNG WING FAI
  • CAAR16/1987THE QUEEN v. PANG CHEUNG KIM
  • CAAR19/1986THE QUEEN v. CHAN CHI MAN
  • CAAR22/1986THE QUEEN v. WONG TAK-CHI
  • CAAR23/1986THE QUEEN v. MA LAI WU AND OTHERS
  • CAAR4/1986THE QUEEN v. LY XUONG THANH
  • CAAR5/1986THE QUEEN v. YEUNG KAM-WAH (D1) AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR8/1986THE QUEEN v. ALBERT STANLEY MALIA
  • CAAR9/1986THE QUEEN v. CHU TAI WAI AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR9/1989THE QUEEN v. CHAN KOON KWOK ARTHUR
  • CACC1000/1976LAI FAT v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC1000/1983THE QUEEN v. LEE HEI KEUNG
  • CACC1001/1979LAW WAI-MING AND ANOTHER v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1972LIU KAM-MAN v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1973LO WAI KEUNG v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1977TAM YUK-MUI (F) v. THE QUEEN
4726-EN-1978-06-17

KWOK YEW-LAM v. THE QUEEN

HTML content

CACC000482/1978

 

IN THE SUPREME COURTCriminal Appeal
 1978 No. 482

 

BETWEEN:  
 KWOK Yew-LamAppellant
 and 
 THE QUEENRespondent

Coram: Briggs, C.J.

Date of Judgment: 17th June, 1978.

 

-----------------

JUDGMENT

-----------------

 

1. The appellant was found guilty of the offence of being a taxi driver and refusing without reasonable excuse to drive the taxi to a place indicated by the hirer. This offence is contrary to regulations 27(a) and 44(1) of the Road Traffic (Taxis, Public Omnibuses and Public Cars) Regulations.

2. He was fined $200 and disqualified from driving all motor vehicles other than motor cycles for a period of six months.

3. He appealed against conviction and sentence. I dismissed the appeal against conviction. The sentence took effect on April 14th, 1978. The sentence is particularly severe for a taxi driver since it affects his livelihood.

4. In the event, I allowed the appeal against sentence to the extent that the period of disqualification was reduced so as to enable the appellant to drive from the date of the hearing of the appeal, namely June 17th, 1978

 

 

 (Geoffrey Briggs)
 Chief Justice.

 

Representation:

Gunston (Cunston & Chow) for Appellant

Alderdice for the Crown/Respondent