HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Criminal Appeal1978

LAM SHIU-YEE v. THE QUEEN

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR10/1992THE QUEEN v. WONG MOK DIN
  • CAAR11/1986THE QUEEN v. CHUNG WAI-YIU
  • CAAR12/1986THE QUEEN v. HSU SAI-MAN AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR15/1986THE QUEEN v. WU KAM MING AND OTHERS
  • CAAR15/1987THE QUEEN v. LEUNG WING FAI
  • CAAR16/1987THE QUEEN v. PANG CHEUNG KIM
  • CAAR19/1986THE QUEEN v. CHAN CHI MAN
  • CAAR22/1986THE QUEEN v. WONG TAK-CHI
  • CAAR23/1986THE QUEEN v. MA LAI WU AND OTHERS
  • CAAR4/1986THE QUEEN v. LY XUONG THANH
  • CAAR5/1986THE QUEEN v. YEUNG KAM-WAH (D1) AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR8/1986THE QUEEN v. ALBERT STANLEY MALIA
  • CAAR9/1986THE QUEEN v. CHU TAI WAI AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR9/1989THE QUEEN v. CHAN KOON KWOK ARTHUR
  • CACC1000/1976LAI FAT v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC1000/1983THE QUEEN v. LEE HEI KEUNG
  • CACC1001/1979LAW WAI-MING AND ANOTHER v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1972LIU KAM-MAN v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1973LO WAI KEUNG v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1977TAM YUK-MUI (F) v. THE QUEEN
7021-EN-1978-10-31

LAM SHIU-YEE v. THE QUEEN

HTML content

CACC000775/1978

 

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL 
  
 1978 No. 775
 (Criminal)

 

BETWEEN  
 LAM Shiu-yeeAppellant
 and 
 THE QUEENRespondent

-----------------

Coram: Huggins, J.A., Leonard and Li, JJ.

Date of Judgment: 31st October 1978.

 

-----------------

JUDGMENT

-----------------

 

Huggins, J.A.:

1. This Appellant was charged on one charge of possession of an offensive weapon in a public place and two of robbery. He was arrested when, upon a search in the street, he was found to be carrying a four-inch knife. The learned judge thought that the minimum mandatory sentence was appropriate for that offence, that is to say a sentence of six months' imprisonment, and we see no reason to disagree. The robberies were committed by the Appellant on his own and not in a gang. That said, the circumstances are serious enough. The Appellant in one case met a woman and her daughter as they were leaving a flat, threatened them with a knife, took $100, and then forced them back into the flat where further property was stolen. The second offence was similarly one where he went into domestic premises and at knife point tied up the occupants and stole their valuables. For those offences the learned judge imposed concurrent sentences of four years' and five years' imprisonment, properly making them consecutive to the first offence of possession of an offensive weapon. The Appellant is twenty-five years of age and has a clear record. We have come to the conclusion that the overall sentence in this case was unduly heavy. Having regard to all the circumstances including his pleas of Guilty we reduce the sentences on Charges (2) and (3) to sentences of three years' imprisonment, which will be consecutive to the six months. 

 

31st October 1978.

 

Representation: