HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Criminal Appeal1978

LAU KWOK-HUNG v. THE QUEEN

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR10/1992THE QUEEN v. WONG MOK DIN
  • CAAR11/1986THE QUEEN v. CHUNG WAI-YIU
  • CAAR12/1986THE QUEEN v. HSU SAI-MAN AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR15/1986THE QUEEN v. WU KAM MING AND OTHERS
  • CAAR15/1987THE QUEEN v. LEUNG WING FAI
  • CAAR16/1987THE QUEEN v. PANG CHEUNG KIM
  • CAAR19/1986THE QUEEN v. CHAN CHI MAN
  • CAAR22/1986THE QUEEN v. WONG TAK-CHI
  • CAAR23/1986THE QUEEN v. MA LAI WU AND OTHERS
  • CAAR4/1986THE QUEEN v. LY XUONG THANH
  • CAAR5/1986THE QUEEN v. YEUNG KAM-WAH (D1) AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR8/1986THE QUEEN v. ALBERT STANLEY MALIA
  • CAAR9/1986THE QUEEN v. CHU TAI WAI AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR9/1989THE QUEEN v. CHAN KOON KWOK ARTHUR
  • CACC1000/1976LAI FAT v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC1000/1983THE QUEEN v. LEE HEI KEUNG
  • CACC1001/1979LAW WAI-MING AND ANOTHER v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1972LIU KAM-MAN v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1973LO WAI KEUNG v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1977TAM YUK-MUI (F) v. THE QUEEN
7388-EN-1978-12-05

LAU KWOK-HUNG v. THE QUEEN

HTML content

CACC000885/1978

 

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL1978 No.885
 (Criminal)

 

BETWEEN:  
 LAU KWOK-HUNGAppellant
 AND 
 THE QUEENRespondent

Coram: Briggs, C.J., Huggins & Pickering, JJ.A.

Date of Judgment: 5th December, 1978.

 

-----------------

JUDGMENT

-----------------

 

1. The appellant pleaded guilty to six cases of robbery. In each case the victim was a taxi driver and in each case a knife was used. The appellant stole money, and on three occasions a watch from his victims.

2. The appellant is aged 20 and he had a clear record. Counsel urged that this was a case in which the court might consider varying the sentence and making an order that the appellant be detained either in a training centre or a detention centre.

3. We think that the offences are too serious to adopt such a course. But taking into consideration the youth of the appellant and his clear record, and the fact that he pleaded guilty, we think that the sentence passed by the trial judge of 5 ½ years was excessive. In the event, we think that justice would best be done if we allow the appeal to the extent of substituting a sentence of three and a half years' imprisonment for that passed in the court below and we order accordingly.

 

 

 (Geoffrey Briggs)
 President.

 

Representation:

Bokhary (D.L.A.) for appellant

Gall for crown