HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Criminal Appeal1979

HUI TAI-TAK v. THE QUEEN

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR10/1992THE QUEEN v. WONG MOK DIN
  • CAAR11/1986THE QUEEN v. CHUNG WAI-YIU
  • CAAR12/1986THE QUEEN v. HSU SAI-MAN AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR15/1986THE QUEEN v. WU KAM MING AND OTHERS
  • CAAR15/1987THE QUEEN v. LEUNG WING FAI
  • CAAR16/1987THE QUEEN v. PANG CHEUNG KIM
  • CAAR19/1986THE QUEEN v. CHAN CHI MAN
  • CAAR22/1986THE QUEEN v. WONG TAK-CHI
  • CAAR23/1986THE QUEEN v. MA LAI WU AND OTHERS
  • CAAR4/1986THE QUEEN v. LY XUONG THANH
  • CAAR5/1986THE QUEEN v. YEUNG KAM-WAH (D1) AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR8/1986THE QUEEN v. ALBERT STANLEY MALIA
  • CAAR9/1986THE QUEEN v. CHU TAI WAI AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR9/1989THE QUEEN v. CHAN KOON KWOK ARTHUR
  • CACC1000/1976LAI FAT v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC1000/1983THE QUEEN v. LEE HEI KEUNG
  • CACC1001/1979LAW WAI-MING AND ANOTHER v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1972LIU KAM-MAN v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1973LO WAI KEUNG v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1977TAM YUK-MUI (F) v. THE QUEEN
3213-EN-1979-07-23

HUI TAI-TAK v. THE QUEEN

HTML content

CACC000336/1979

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL

1979 No.336
(Criminal)

 

BETWEEN:
HUI Tai-TakAppellant

AND

THE QUEENRespondent

Coram: Roberts, C.J., Huggins, J.A. and McMullin, J.

Date of Judgment: 23 July 1979

 

-----------------

JUDGMENT

-----------------

 

Roberts, C.J.:

1. This appellant, aged 53, has an appalling record, with 32 previous convictions.

2. He was sentenced to 4½ years' concurrent on two charges of burglary, to which he pleaded guilty.

3. During the appeal it was urged upon us that we should "give the appellant a chance" which he said he had never had.

4. It is true that, save on one occasion when he was bound over, he has been sent to prison on each of his 20 appearances in court, the sentences totalling about 25 years. Thus, none of the other alternatives had been tried and he has spent most of his life since 1951 in prison.

5. With this record, it was perfectly correct for the trial judge to pass the sentence which he did. Nevertheless, we were disposed to take an exceptional course and to put the appellant on probation, if it were possible for arrangements to be made for him to be subject to some supervision in a specified place of residence.

6. We therefore made a Probation Order for two years, on condition that the appellant -

(a)should be of good behaviour and keep the peace;
(b)should keep in touch with the Probation Officer in accordance with the latter's instructions;
(c)shall receive visits from the Probation Officer at his place of residence; and
(d)shall reside as directed by the Probation Officer and inform him at once of any change of employment.

7. It is intended (and the appellant gave his agreement to this) that he should be required to reside for up to three months at the D.P.A.S. Hostel at the Hong Kong Centre and thereafter at the Pillar Island Hostel operated by the Helping Hand.

 

Representation:

A. Huggins (D.L.A.) for appellant

Stock for crown