HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Criminal Appeal1979

CHUNG CHI-KEUNG v. THE QUEEN

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR10/1992THE QUEEN v. WONG MOK DIN
  • CAAR11/1986THE QUEEN v. CHUNG WAI-YIU
  • CAAR12/1986THE QUEEN v. HSU SAI-MAN AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR15/1986THE QUEEN v. WU KAM MING AND OTHERS
  • CAAR15/1987THE QUEEN v. LEUNG WING FAI
  • CAAR16/1987THE QUEEN v. PANG CHEUNG KIM
  • CAAR19/1986THE QUEEN v. CHAN CHI MAN
  • CAAR22/1986THE QUEEN v. WONG TAK-CHI
  • CAAR23/1986THE QUEEN v. MA LAI WU AND OTHERS
  • CAAR4/1986THE QUEEN v. LY XUONG THANH
  • CAAR5/1986THE QUEEN v. YEUNG KAM-WAH (D1) AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR8/1986THE QUEEN v. ALBERT STANLEY MALIA
  • CAAR9/1986THE QUEEN v. CHU TAI WAI AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR9/1989THE QUEEN v. CHAN KOON KWOK ARTHUR
  • CACC1000/1976LAI FAT v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC1000/1983THE QUEEN v. LEE HEI KEUNG
  • CACC1001/1979LAW WAI-MING AND ANOTHER v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1972LIU KAM-MAN v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1973LO WAI KEUNG v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1977TAM YUK-MUI (F) v. THE QUEEN
3675-EN-1979-02-10

CHUNG CHI-KEUNG v. THE QUEEN

HTML content

CACC000038/1979

IN THE SUPREME COURTCriminal Appeal
1979 No. 38

BETWEEN:
CHUNG CHI-KEUNG

Appellant

AND

THE QUEENRespondent

Coram: Briggs, C.J.

Date of Judgment: 10 February 1979

 

-----------------

JUDGMENT

-----------------

 

1. In this case the appellant pleaded guilty to dangerous driving and was sentenced to a fine of $300 and disqualified from holding a driving licence for twelve months. The disqualification relates to all types of vehicles.

2. The appellant struck a 13 year old boy, who was on a zebra-crossing.

3. Nothing was said in the court below as to the previous record of the appellant, who is a taxi driver, and it appeared that the gravamen of the charge was that he did not reduce his speed, which was about 22 m.p.h. when approaching the zebra-crossing. The victim of the accident was not seriously hurt.

4. In my view, this is a case where the appeal should be allowed to the extent that the disqualification imposed on the appellant is confined to taxi and public light bus licences only. And I so order.

 

 

(Geoffrey Briggs)
Chief Justice.

 

Representation:

Appellant in person.

Ingham for the Crown/Respondent.