HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Criminal Appeal1980

CHAN KAM PING v. THE QUEEN

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR10/1992THE QUEEN v. WONG MOK DIN
  • CAAR11/1986THE QUEEN v. CHUNG WAI-YIU
  • CAAR12/1986THE QUEEN v. HSU SAI-MAN AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR15/1986THE QUEEN v. WU KAM MING AND OTHERS
  • CAAR15/1987THE QUEEN v. LEUNG WING FAI
  • CAAR16/1987THE QUEEN v. PANG CHEUNG KIM
  • CAAR19/1986THE QUEEN v. CHAN CHI MAN
  • CAAR22/1986THE QUEEN v. WONG TAK-CHI
  • CAAR23/1986THE QUEEN v. MA LAI WU AND OTHERS
  • CAAR4/1986THE QUEEN v. LY XUONG THANH
  • CAAR5/1986THE QUEEN v. YEUNG KAM-WAH (D1) AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR8/1986THE QUEEN v. ALBERT STANLEY MALIA
  • CAAR9/1986THE QUEEN v. CHU TAI WAI AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR9/1989THE QUEEN v. CHAN KOON KWOK ARTHUR
  • CACC1000/1976LAI FAT v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC1000/1983THE QUEEN v. LEE HEI KEUNG
  • CACC1001/1979LAW WAI-MING AND ANOTHER v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1972LIU KAM-MAN v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1973LO WAI KEUNG v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1977TAM YUK-MUI (F) v. THE QUEEN
375-EN-1980-12-18

CHAN KAM PING v. THE QUEEN

HTML content

CACC001002/1980

IN THE SUPREME COURT
Criminal Appeal
1980, No. 1002

BETWEEN
CHAN KAM PINGAppellant
and
THE QUEENRespondent

Coram: Barker, J.

Date of Judgment: 18th December, 1980.

 

-----------------

JUDGMENT

-----------------

 

1. Chan Kam-ping, the offence of aiding and abetting the remaining in the Colony of an illegal immigrant is a serious offence which almost invariably carries with it a sentence of immediate custodial imprisonment and the length of that imprisonment is usually, unless there are aggravating or mitigating circumstances, twelve months. In your case the learned magistrate imposed a sentence of nine months. But there are a number of factors which work in your favour. First, you have a clear record, secondly you pleaded guilty, thirdly what happened was not done by any sort of pre-arrangement, fourthly, the man who was to come in was a relative of your cousin and therefore you were only helping a distant relative or someone who stood in the shoes of a distant relative and lastly, there was no question that you were to get any kind of reward for what you did. I am still of the view that what you did merits an immediate sentence of imprisonment. Nevertheless, taking all the matters which I have adverted to into account I am of the view that a sentence of 9 months' imprisonment was too long. I shall substitute a sentence of 4 months' imprisonment.

 

Representation:

Appellant in person

Cunningham for Crown/Respondent