HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Criminal Appeal1980

LAW KAM-YING v. THE QUEEN

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR10/1992THE QUEEN v. WONG MOK DIN
  • CAAR11/1986THE QUEEN v. CHUNG WAI-YIU
  • CAAR12/1986THE QUEEN v. HSU SAI-MAN AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR15/1986THE QUEEN v. WU KAM MING AND OTHERS
  • CAAR15/1987THE QUEEN v. LEUNG WING FAI
  • CAAR16/1987THE QUEEN v. PANG CHEUNG KIM
  • CAAR19/1986THE QUEEN v. CHAN CHI MAN
  • CAAR22/1986THE QUEEN v. WONG TAK-CHI
  • CAAR23/1986THE QUEEN v. MA LAI WU AND OTHERS
  • CAAR4/1986THE QUEEN v. LY XUONG THANH
  • CAAR5/1986THE QUEEN v. YEUNG KAM-WAH (D1) AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR8/1986THE QUEEN v. ALBERT STANLEY MALIA
  • CAAR9/1986THE QUEEN v. CHU TAI WAI AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR9/1989THE QUEEN v. CHAN KOON KWOK ARTHUR
  • CACC1000/1976LAI FAT v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC1000/1983THE QUEEN v. LEE HEI KEUNG
  • CACC1001/1979LAW WAI-MING AND ANOTHER v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1972LIU KAM-MAN v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1973LO WAI KEUNG v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1977TAM YUK-MUI (F) v. THE QUEEN
4985-EN-1980-07-17

LAW KAM-YING v. THE QUEEN

HTML content

CACC000506/1980

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF HONG KONG

(Appellate Jurisdiction)

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 506 OF 1980.

-----------------

BETWEEN
LAW Kam-yingAppellant

AND

THE QUEENRespondent

-----------------

Coram: Hon. LIU, J. in Court.

Date of Judgment: 17 July 1980

 

-----------------

JUDGMENT

-----------------

 

1. I do not propose to call upon counsel for the Crown. You were convicted of the offence of assault with intent to rob. Your plea of guilty to the charge was duly taken into account. I have listened carefully to your address this morning, but the gravity of the offence is not a matter to be condoned.

2. You were convicted of robbery in 1978, and you were sent to a Detention Centre in October.

3. In this case, you attempted to rob the lady victim outside a lift on the ground floor of a building in Wyndham Street by hitting her on the head and kicking her after her fall to the ground.

4. The Training Centre Report recommended that you would require a period of institutional training. The probation officer was not in favour of any probation. There is no merit in your application for leave to appeal against sentence. You are 18 years' old, but you display more than your fair share of immaturity. At one stage before the learned magistrate, your demeanour caused some alarm, and a psychiatric report was sent for.

5. However, I would give you the benefit of doubt that your application may have possibly been induced by your inability to appreciate the gravity of the offence. Therefore, I would not consider ordering your sentence to run from any date other than that ordered by the learned magistrate. But you must be told in no uncertain terms that there is no merit in your application. For these reasons, your application for leave to appeal against sentence is dismissed, and the sentence passed on you by the learned magistrate is affirmed.

(B. LIU)
Judge of High Court

 

Representation: