HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Criminal Appeal1981

CHU KAM HUNG v. THE QUEEN

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR10/1992THE QUEEN v. WONG MOK DIN
  • CAAR11/1986THE QUEEN v. CHUNG WAI-YIU
  • CAAR12/1986THE QUEEN v. HSU SAI-MAN AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR15/1986THE QUEEN v. WU KAM MING AND OTHERS
  • CAAR15/1987THE QUEEN v. LEUNG WING FAI
  • CAAR16/1987THE QUEEN v. PANG CHEUNG KIM
  • CAAR19/1986THE QUEEN v. CHAN CHI MAN
  • CAAR22/1986THE QUEEN v. WONG TAK-CHI
  • CAAR23/1986THE QUEEN v. MA LAI WU AND OTHERS
  • CAAR4/1986THE QUEEN v. LY XUONG THANH
  • CAAR5/1986THE QUEEN v. YEUNG KAM-WAH (D1) AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR8/1986THE QUEEN v. ALBERT STANLEY MALIA
  • CAAR9/1986THE QUEEN v. CHU TAI WAI AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR9/1989THE QUEEN v. CHAN KOON KWOK ARTHUR
  • CACC1000/1976LAI FAT v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC1000/1983THE QUEEN v. LEE HEI KEUNG
  • CACC1001/1979LAW WAI-MING AND ANOTHER v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1972LIU KAM-MAN v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1973LO WAI KEUNG v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1977TAM YUK-MUI (F) v. THE QUEEN
3980-EN-1981-05-27

CHU KAM HUNG v. THE QUEEN

HTML content

CACC000407/1981

 

IN THE SUPREME COURT 
  
 Criminal Appeal
 1981 No. 407

 

BETWEEN  
 CHU KAM HUNGAppellant
 and 
 THE QUEENRespondent

-----------------

Coram: Liu, J. in Court.

Date of Judgment: 27th May 1981

 

-----------------

JUDGMENT

-----------------

 

1. In early morning on the 9th March, you parked somewhere near a theatre. When a party of policemen approached you in number of four, you suddenly sped away narrowly missing one. You turned right in such a manner that the left portion of your car scraped the ground. You pleaded guilty. It is now submitted on your behalf that mitigation was not properly made before the learned Magistrate. The matters have now been fully canvassed before this Court, but I do not see any mitigating circumstances to warrant an interference with the penalty imposed by the court below. The holder of a driving licence is expected to exercise more care and should all the more realise the implications than a provisional licencee. In the circumstances, the appeal against the sentence must be dismissed and the sentence affirmed.

 

 

 (B. Liu)
 Judge of the High Court

 

Representation:

Mr. Alexander Wong instructed by Wing-Sum Lo & Co. for Appellant.

Mr. F. Whitehouse, counsel for Respondent.