HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Criminal Appeal1983

THE QUEEN v. SIU YUN-SANG

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR10/1992THE QUEEN v. WONG MOK DIN
  • CAAR11/1986THE QUEEN v. CHUNG WAI-YIU
  • CAAR12/1986THE QUEEN v. HSU SAI-MAN AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR15/1986THE QUEEN v. WU KAM MING AND OTHERS
  • CAAR15/1987THE QUEEN v. LEUNG WING FAI
  • CAAR16/1987THE QUEEN v. PANG CHEUNG KIM
  • CAAR19/1986THE QUEEN v. CHAN CHI MAN
  • CAAR22/1986THE QUEEN v. WONG TAK-CHI
  • CAAR23/1986THE QUEEN v. MA LAI WU AND OTHERS
  • CAAR4/1986THE QUEEN v. LY XUONG THANH
  • CAAR5/1986THE QUEEN v. YEUNG KAM-WAH (D1) AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR8/1986THE QUEEN v. ALBERT STANLEY MALIA
  • CAAR9/1986THE QUEEN v. CHU TAI WAI AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR9/1989THE QUEEN v. CHAN KOON KWOK ARTHUR
  • CACC1000/1976LAI FAT v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC1000/1983THE QUEEN v. LEE HEI KEUNG
  • CACC1001/1979LAW WAI-MING AND ANOTHER v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1972LIU KAM-MAN v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1973LO WAI KEUNG v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1977TAM YUK-MUI (F) v. THE QUEEN
5123-EN-1983-07-22

THE QUEEN v. SIU YUN-SANG

HTML content

CACC000052/1983

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL 1983, No. 52

(Criminal)

BETWEEN

THE QUEEN

Respondent
and
SIU YUN-SANGAppellant
----------

Coram : Sir Alan Huggins, V.-P., Yang & Barker, JJ.A.

Date : 22nd July 1983

__________

JUDGMENT

__________

 

Sir Alan Huggins, V.-P. :

1. This is an application for leave to appeal against a sentence of three years' imprisonment for possession of a dangerous drug. The Appellant was originally charged with possession for the purpose of unlawful trafficking but after a trial the judge came to the conclusion that the presumption of possession for trafficking was rebutted and convicted of the latter offence.

2. The quantity of drugs concerned was 51.46 grammes of a mixture containing 15.19 grammes of salts of esters of morphine. Three years' imprisonment was, as Mr. Corrigan points out, the maximum which could be imposed under s.8. He says that no issue was ever raised by the Appellant as to his possession of the drugs and that the whole case was fought as to the purpose for which the possession existed. Again, Mr. Corrigan concedes that this is a case where a custodial sentence is inevitable. The Appellant is 50 years of age. He has one previous conviction for possession for the purpose of unlawful trafficking, for which he was sentenced to 12 months' imprisonment.

3. In our view this sentence was manifestly excessive. We grant leave to appeal. We allow the appeal and reduce the sentence to one of 18 months' imprisonment.

22nd July 1983