HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Criminal Appeal1983

CHEUNG KAM KUEN v. THE QUEEN

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR10/1992THE QUEEN v. WONG MOK DIN
  • CAAR11/1986THE QUEEN v. CHUNG WAI-YIU
  • CAAR12/1986THE QUEEN v. HSU SAI-MAN AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR15/1986THE QUEEN v. WU KAM MING AND OTHERS
  • CAAR15/1987THE QUEEN v. LEUNG WING FAI
  • CAAR16/1987THE QUEEN v. PANG CHEUNG KIM
  • CAAR19/1986THE QUEEN v. CHAN CHI MAN
  • CAAR22/1986THE QUEEN v. WONG TAK-CHI
  • CAAR23/1986THE QUEEN v. MA LAI WU AND OTHERS
  • CAAR4/1986THE QUEEN v. LY XUONG THANH
  • CAAR5/1986THE QUEEN v. YEUNG KAM-WAH (D1) AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR8/1986THE QUEEN v. ALBERT STANLEY MALIA
  • CAAR9/1986THE QUEEN v. CHU TAI WAI AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR9/1989THE QUEEN v. CHAN KOON KWOK ARTHUR
  • CACC1000/1976LAI FAT v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC1000/1983THE QUEEN v. LEE HEI KEUNG
  • CACC1001/1979LAW WAI-MING AND ANOTHER v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1972LIU KAM-MAN v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1973LO WAI KEUNG v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1977TAM YUK-MUI (F) v. THE QUEEN
7079-EN-1983-07-19

CHEUNG KAM KUEN v. THE QUEEN

HTML content

CACC000790/1983

IN THE HIGH COURT

1983 No. 790

(Criminal)

BETWEEN

CHEUNG KAM KUENAppellant

and

THE QUEEN

---------

Respondent

Coram: Jones J.

Date: 19th July, 1983.

__________

JUDGMENT

__________

 

1. The appellant who is deaf and dumb pleaded guilty to a charge of careless driving at the North Kowloon Magistracy on the 23rd May 1983. He was fined $400 and disqualified from driving until he has passed another driving test. The appellant appeals against the sentence of disqualification.

2. The facts reveal that on the 1st September 1982 at about 8.30 p.m. the appellant drove a car into Yen Chow Street in contravention of a No Entry sign. He was seen by a police officer who was driving a motor cycle. The police officer tried to stop the appellant, but in the course of overtaking the appellant's car the appellant moved to the right which resulted in the police officer swerving in the same direction causing him to fall from the motor cycle. The police officer received a slight injury, and there was some damage to the motor cycle. However, no specific details of these matters were placed before the Court.

3. Although the facts show that the police officer switched on the blue light on his motor cycle to attract the attention of the appellant there was no evidence that a siren was used. Nevertheless, it appears that the learned magistrate having regard to his decision assumed that a siren had been sounded which had not been heard by the appellant. However, in the absence of proof to support such a finding there were no grounds to suggest that the appellant's ability to drive was impaired as a result of his medical condition.

4. As a result, I allowed the appeal limited to the removal of the disqualification and the requirement to take another driving test.

(B.L. Jones)

Judge of the High Court

Representation:

Mr. Petrus Chan (Ronald Ho & Co.) for Appellant.

Mr. J.S. Conyngham (Legal Department) for Crown/Respondent.