HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Criminal Appeal1985

THE QUEEN v. WONG WAI POR

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR10/1992THE QUEEN v. WONG MOK DIN
  • CAAR11/1986THE QUEEN v. CHUNG WAI-YIU
  • CAAR12/1986THE QUEEN v. HSU SAI-MAN AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR15/1986THE QUEEN v. WU KAM MING AND OTHERS
  • CAAR15/1987THE QUEEN v. LEUNG WING FAI
  • CAAR16/1987THE QUEEN v. PANG CHEUNG KIM
  • CAAR19/1986THE QUEEN v. CHAN CHI MAN
  • CAAR22/1986THE QUEEN v. WONG TAK-CHI
  • CAAR23/1986THE QUEEN v. MA LAI WU AND OTHERS
  • CAAR4/1986THE QUEEN v. LY XUONG THANH
  • CAAR5/1986THE QUEEN v. YEUNG KAM-WAH (D1) AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR8/1986THE QUEEN v. ALBERT STANLEY MALIA
  • CAAR9/1986THE QUEEN v. CHU TAI WAI AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR9/1989THE QUEEN v. CHAN KOON KWOK ARTHUR
  • CACC1000/1976LAI FAT v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC1000/1983THE QUEEN v. LEE HEI KEUNG
  • CACC1001/1979LAW WAI-MING AND ANOTHER v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1972LIU KAM-MAN v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1973LO WAI KEUNG v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1977TAM YUK-MUI (F) v. THE QUEEN
39065-EN-1986-03-05

THE QUEEN v. WONG WAI POR

HTML content

CACC000464/1985

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL

1985, No. 464

(Criminal)

BETWEEN

THE QUEEN

and

WONG WAI POR

---------

 

Coram: Li, V.-P., Yang & Kempster, JJ.A.

Date of hearing: 5th March, 1986.

Date of delivery of judgment: 5th March, 1986.

___________

JUDGMENT

___________

 

Yang, J. A.:

1. This is an application for leave to appeal against sentence. The Defendant pleaded guilty to a charge of robbery and was sentenced to 5½ years' imprisonment.

2. The facts are these.  At about 5.20 p.m. on the 29th September 1985, a young lady of 21 years of age was returning to her apartment in Shaukiwan.  When she was inside the lift, the Defendant who was also in the lift produced a knife and held it against her throat.  A gold necklace and some $40 in cash were stolen from her.

3. The Applicant is 27 years of age and has a criminal record, but there was nothing similar. The judge in imposing the sentence upon him took into consideration his plea of guilty, though he commented that the Applicant had been caught fleeing the scene by the victim's family who found him in possession of the necklace and therefore a plea of guilty was all but inevitable.  Counsel for the Applicant argued that the judge's starting point of a sentence of 6 years for this type of offence is too high having regard to Application for Review, 1985 No. 1, where this Court laid down a guideline for a "normal" lift robbery and suggested a sentence of 5 years after a full trial.

4. Having regard to that case, we are of the opinion that the sentence ought to be reduced by one year. We therefore treat the application as an appeal, allow the appeal and reduce the sentence of 5½ years to 4½ years.

T. L. Yang

Justice of Appeal

Representation:

Michael Lunn (D.L.A.) for Applicant

F. C. Whitehouse, Crown Counsel for DPP/Respondent