HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Magistracy Appeal1985

THE QUEEN v. KONG KWONG-SANG

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR10/1992THE QUEEN v. WONG MOK DIN
  • CAAR11/1986THE QUEEN v. CHUNG WAI-YIU
  • CAAR12/1986THE QUEEN v. HSU SAI-MAN AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR15/1986THE QUEEN v. WU KAM MING AND OTHERS
  • CAAR15/1987THE QUEEN v. LEUNG WING FAI
  • CAAR16/1987THE QUEEN v. PANG CHEUNG KIM
  • CAAR19/1986THE QUEEN v. CHAN CHI MAN
  • CAAR22/1986THE QUEEN v. WONG TAK-CHI
  • CAAR23/1986THE QUEEN v. MA LAI WU AND OTHERS
  • CAAR4/1986THE QUEEN v. LY XUONG THANH
  • CAAR5/1986THE QUEEN v. YEUNG KAM-WAH (D1) AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR8/1986THE QUEEN v. ALBERT STANLEY MALIA
  • CAAR9/1986THE QUEEN v. CHU TAI WAI AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR9/1989THE QUEEN v. CHAN KOON KWOK ARTHUR
  • CACC1000/1976LAI FAT v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC1000/1983THE QUEEN v. LEE HEI KEUNG
  • CACC1001/1979LAW WAI-MING AND ANOTHER v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1972LIU KAM-MAN v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1973LO WAI KEUNG v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1977TAM YUK-MUI (F) v. THE QUEEN
40616-EN-1985-09-12

THE QUEEN v. KONG KWONG-SANG

HTML content

HCMA000656/1985

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF HONG KONG

(Appellate Jurisdiction)

MAGISTRACY CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 656 OF 1985

 

_______________

BETWEENTHE QUEEN

and

KONG Kwong-sangAppellant
_______________

Coram: Hon. Barnes, J. in Court

Date of hearing: 12th September, 1985

Date of judgment: 12th September, 1985

___________

JUDGMENT

___________

1. The Appellant pleaded guilty to two charges: (A) Moving a vehicle after an accident contrary to section 57(1) of the Road Traffic Ordinance, and (B) failing to report an accident contrary to section 56(3) and (6) of the Road Traffic Ordinance. He was convicted and fined $1,500 and disqualified from driving a motor vehicle for eighteen months on each charge.

2. He now appeals against the orders for disqualification only.

3. He has filed a number of grounds of appeal but it is necessary to consider only one. That ground is "that the trial Magistrate has no jurisdiction under section 69(1) of the Road Traffic Ordinance to impose the disqualification orders ...."

4. The power conferred by section 69(1) to order disqualification is in the following terms:-

"69(1) ...... a court before which a person is convicted of any of the following offences may order him to be disqualified for such period as the court thinks fit --

 

(a)any offence under this Ordinance in connexion with the driving of a motor vehicle ...."

Counsel for the Appellant and for the Respondent both agreed that neither offence is an offence "in connection with the driving of a motor vehicle."

5. I agree. The appeal is allowed and the orders for disqualification are set aside.

(E.C. Barnes)

Judge of the High Court

Representation:

Mr. Browne, Crown Counsel for the Crown.

Mr. Frank Wong (D.L.A.) for the Appellant.