HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Criminal Appeal1986

THE QUEEN v. WONG KWAI SUN

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR10/1992THE QUEEN v. WONG MOK DIN
  • CAAR11/1986THE QUEEN v. CHUNG WAI-YIU
  • CAAR12/1986THE QUEEN v. HSU SAI-MAN AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR15/1986THE QUEEN v. WU KAM MING AND OTHERS
  • CAAR15/1987THE QUEEN v. LEUNG WING FAI
  • CAAR16/1987THE QUEEN v. PANG CHEUNG KIM
  • CAAR19/1986THE QUEEN v. CHAN CHI MAN
  • CAAR22/1986THE QUEEN v. WONG TAK-CHI
  • CAAR23/1986THE QUEEN v. MA LAI WU AND OTHERS
  • CAAR4/1986THE QUEEN v. LY XUONG THANH
  • CAAR5/1986THE QUEEN v. YEUNG KAM-WAH (D1) AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR8/1986THE QUEEN v. ALBERT STANLEY MALIA
  • CAAR9/1986THE QUEEN v. CHU TAI WAI AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR9/1989THE QUEEN v. CHAN KOON KWOK ARTHUR
  • CACC1000/1976LAI FAT v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC1000/1983THE QUEEN v. LEE HEI KEUNG
  • CACC1001/1979LAW WAI-MING AND ANOTHER v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1972LIU KAM-MAN v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1973LO WAI KEUNG v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1977TAM YUK-MUI (F) v. THE QUEEN
39302-EN-1986-08-29

THE QUEEN v. WONG KWAI SUN

HTML content

CACC000235/1986

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL

1986, No. 235

(Criminal)

BETWEEN

THE QUEEN

 

and

 

WONG KWAI-SUN

_________________

Coram: Sir Alan Huggins, V.-P., Kempster, J.A. & Addison, J.

Date of Hearing: 29th August 1986

Date of Judgment: 29th August 1986

__________

JUDGMENT

__________

Sir Alan Huggins, V.-P.:

1. This is an application for leave to appeal against sentence of five years' and three years' imprisonment for robbery and assault with intent to rob. The offences were very closely connected. They were committed in or near a lift and in each instance the Defendant grabbed the victim by the neck. The second victim struggled and prevented the robbery.

2. The Applicant had previous convictions and the learned judge described his record as a "disgraceful" one. In 1984 he was convicted of eight robberies, an attempted robbery, two woundings, two indecent assaults and a common assault all at the same time.

3. We asked for a social welfare report. It shows that the Applicant deserves little credit for his past life. Nevertheless he is only nineteen years of age and we incline to the view that the judge did not give sufficient weight to the plea of guilty. Accordingly we allow this application and, treating this as the appeal, substitute on the 1st charge a sentence of four years imprisonment.

29th August 1986

Representation:

Appellant in person.

Bruce for Crown.