HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Criminal Appeal1986

THE QUEEN v. LO CHI MAN

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR10/1992THE QUEEN v. WONG MOK DIN
  • CAAR11/1986THE QUEEN v. CHUNG WAI-YIU
  • CAAR12/1986THE QUEEN v. HSU SAI-MAN AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR15/1986THE QUEEN v. WU KAM MING AND OTHERS
  • CAAR15/1987THE QUEEN v. LEUNG WING FAI
  • CAAR16/1987THE QUEEN v. PANG CHEUNG KIM
  • CAAR19/1986THE QUEEN v. CHAN CHI MAN
  • CAAR22/1986THE QUEEN v. WONG TAK-CHI
  • CAAR23/1986THE QUEEN v. MA LAI WU AND OTHERS
  • CAAR4/1986THE QUEEN v. LY XUONG THANH
  • CAAR5/1986THE QUEEN v. YEUNG KAM-WAH (D1) AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR8/1986THE QUEEN v. ALBERT STANLEY MALIA
  • CAAR9/1986THE QUEEN v. CHU TAI WAI AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR9/1989THE QUEEN v. CHAN KOON KWOK ARTHUR
  • CACC1000/1976LAI FAT v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC1000/1983THE QUEEN v. LEE HEI KEUNG
  • CACC1001/1979LAW WAI-MING AND ANOTHER v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1972LIU KAM-MAN v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1973LO WAI KEUNG v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1977TAM YUK-MUI (F) v. THE QUEEN
38951-EN-1986-11-11

THE QUEEN v. LO CHI MAN

HTML content

CACC000382/1986

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL

1986 No. 382

(Criminal)

BETWEEN

THE QUEEN

 

and

 

LO Chi-man

Coram: Yang, J.A., Silke, J.A. and Kempster, J.A.

Date of Hearing: 11th November 1986

Date of Judgment: 11th November 1986

 

__________

JUDGMENT

__________

Kempster, J.A.:

1. On 18th July this year Lo Chi-man appeared before Deputy Judge Forrest at Victoria District Court upon a number of charges. We are concerned only with the charge of possessing dangerous drugs for the purpose of unlawful trafficking in relation to which he was convicted and against which conviction he has sought leave to appeal. But this morning he told us that he does not wish to pursue this application which, therefore, is dismissed.

2. In relation to the sentence of 5 years passed upon him for the offence and against which his application for leave to appeal stands. Mrs. Yew, on his behalf, has pointed out that the judge apparently attached some significance to the fact that when he was apprehended on 23rd April of this year and found to be in possession of 35 packets containing nearly 29 grammes of a mixture containing heroin he was within the precincts of a methodone treatment centre.

3. This applicant has a shocking record in the context of drugs and would appear to have been an addict for over 10 years. However, his last conviction for trafficking was in May 1975 and there is no firm evidence, though there may be ground for suspicion, that he regarded the patients, if they are properly so to be described, at the methodone clinic as likely potential purchasers of his packets of heroin mixture.

4. We are disposed to approach this sentence from the point of view of general guide-lines and having regard to the quantity of the mixture found, the sentence of 5 years cannot be appropriate. Taking into account the applicants criminal record we think a sentence of 3 years is and was appropriate. Accordingly we allow this application for leave to appeal against sentence, treat this is as the hearing of the appeal and reduce the sentence from 5 to 3 years.

(M. Kempster)

Justice of Appeal

Representation:

Mrs. Lily Yew (D.L.A.) for Applicant (re: sentence only)

Lo Chi Man, Applicant in person

Lugar-Mawson for Crown/Respondent