HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Criminal Appeal1987

THE QUEEN v. AU YIP WAI

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR10/1992THE QUEEN v. WONG MOK DIN
  • CAAR11/1986THE QUEEN v. CHUNG WAI-YIU
  • CAAR12/1986THE QUEEN v. HSU SAI-MAN AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR15/1986THE QUEEN v. WU KAM MING AND OTHERS
  • CAAR15/1987THE QUEEN v. LEUNG WING FAI
  • CAAR16/1987THE QUEEN v. PANG CHEUNG KIM
  • CAAR19/1986THE QUEEN v. CHAN CHI MAN
  • CAAR22/1986THE QUEEN v. WONG TAK-CHI
  • CAAR23/1986THE QUEEN v. MA LAI WU AND OTHERS
  • CAAR4/1986THE QUEEN v. LY XUONG THANH
  • CAAR5/1986THE QUEEN v. YEUNG KAM-WAH (D1) AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR8/1986THE QUEEN v. ALBERT STANLEY MALIA
  • CAAR9/1986THE QUEEN v. CHU TAI WAI AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR9/1989THE QUEEN v. CHAN KOON KWOK ARTHUR
  • CACC1000/1976LAI FAT v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC1000/1983THE QUEEN v. LEE HEI KEUNG
  • CACC1001/1979LAW WAI-MING AND ANOTHER v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1972LIU KAM-MAN v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1973LO WAI KEUNG v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1977TAM YUK-MUI (F) v. THE QUEEN
54233-EN-1987-03-27

THE QUEEN v. AU YIP WAI

HTML content

1987 No. 2
(Criminal)

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL

BETWEEN

 THE QUEENRespondent
 and 
 AU YIP WAIApplicant

______

Coram:  Hon. C.J., Hon. Power, Hon. Barnes, JJ.

Date of hearing: 27th March 1987

Date of delivery of judgment: 27th March 1987

_______________

J U D G M E N T

_______________

Power J.

1. The applicant pleaded guilty to a charge of possession of dangerous drugs for the purpose of unlawful trafficking. The quantity involved was 55.06 grammes of a mixture containing 5.52 grammes of salts of esters of morphine.  The drugs were found after a routine police search at premises at the Tat Lee Building in Shaukiwan Road, and the applicant admitted that they were his. He told the police that he stored them on the premises for someone else. The trial judge in his Reasons for Sentence said that he considered 3½ years was the appropriate sentence but that he took into account the plea of guilty and reduced that sentence by 6 months. The applicant now appeals on the grounds that he was made use of and was only looking after the drugs, that he did not intend to sell them himself, that he is a first offender, and that he pleaded guilty.  The fact that a person is a first offender carries little weight in offences of this kind. The trial judge took into account the plea of guilty and made a reduction therefor. Nothing has been raised before this Court that would warrant our interference in the sentence imposed and the application is therefore refused.

Mr. McWalters, Crown Prosecutor for the Respondent

Applicant Au Yip Wai, in person.