HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Criminal Appeal1987

THE QUEEN v. CHANG KWOK SHU

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR10/1992THE QUEEN v. WONG MOK DIN
  • CAAR11/1986THE QUEEN v. CHUNG WAI-YIU
  • CAAR12/1986THE QUEEN v. HSU SAI-MAN AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR15/1986THE QUEEN v. WU KAM MING AND OTHERS
  • CAAR15/1987THE QUEEN v. LEUNG WING FAI
  • CAAR16/1987THE QUEEN v. PANG CHEUNG KIM
  • CAAR19/1986THE QUEEN v. CHAN CHI MAN
  • CAAR22/1986THE QUEEN v. WONG TAK-CHI
  • CAAR23/1986THE QUEEN v. MA LAI WU AND OTHERS
  • CAAR4/1986THE QUEEN v. LY XUONG THANH
  • CAAR5/1986THE QUEEN v. YEUNG KAM-WAH (D1) AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR8/1986THE QUEEN v. ALBERT STANLEY MALIA
  • CAAR9/1986THE QUEEN v. CHU TAI WAI AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR9/1989THE QUEEN v. CHAN KOON KWOK ARTHUR
  • CACC1000/1976LAI FAT v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC1000/1983THE QUEEN v. LEE HEI KEUNG
  • CACC1001/1979LAW WAI-MING AND ANOTHER v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1972LIU KAM-MAN v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1973LO WAI KEUNG v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1977TAM YUK-MUI (F) v. THE QUEEN
54390-EN-1987-04-15

THE QUEEN v. CHANG KWOK SHU

HTML content

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL

1987, No.42
(Criminal)

BETWEEN

 THE QUEEN 
 and 
 CHANG KWOK-SHU 

------

Coram: Hon. Cons, V.-P., Yang, V.-P. & Silke, J.A.

Date of hearing: 15th April, 1987.

Date of delivery of judgment: 15th April, 1987.

______________

J U D G M E N T

______________

 

Yang, V.-P.:

1. On the 1st August 1986 the Applicant met the victim after work and took her by car against her wish to a secluded spot at South Bay Close, which was a cul-de-sac. It was clear from the evidence that he was infatuated with this young lady and had on previous occasions gone out with her in his car.

2. On the evening in question he attempted to rape her. However the Applicant only threatened her and there was little violence used. The judge in imposing a sentence of two and a half years' imprisonment took that into consideration, and that the Applicant was not a sophisticated young man.

3. However the judge did not seem to have taken sufficient consideration of that part of the Probation Officer's report which dealt with his family background. The Applicant was at the time of the offence twenty-three years of age. He comes from a good family. His father and brothers and sisters are all very supportive. In our view all these factors should have been considered when the appropriate sentence was being assessed.

4. Having regard to the Applicant's family background and the fact that the offence was a one-off incident, we could take a lenient view. We are also happy to note that there is no long-term ill-effect on the victim.

5. We would therefore reduce the sentence from two and a half years to one and a half years. The application is treated as the hearing of the appeal proper and the appeal is allowed to the extent indicated.

 

T.L. Yang
Vice-President

M. Poll (Y.L. Yeung & Co.) for Applicant

A.A. Bruce for Crown/Respondent