HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Magistracy Appeal1988

THE QUEEN v. HUNG YEUK-HUNG

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR10/1992THE QUEEN v. WONG MOK DIN
  • CAAR11/1986THE QUEEN v. CHUNG WAI-YIU
  • CAAR12/1986THE QUEEN v. HSU SAI-MAN AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR15/1986THE QUEEN v. WU KAM MING AND OTHERS
  • CAAR15/1987THE QUEEN v. LEUNG WING FAI
  • CAAR16/1987THE QUEEN v. PANG CHEUNG KIM
  • CAAR19/1986THE QUEEN v. CHAN CHI MAN
  • CAAR22/1986THE QUEEN v. WONG TAK-CHI
  • CAAR23/1986THE QUEEN v. MA LAI WU AND OTHERS
  • CAAR4/1986THE QUEEN v. LY XUONG THANH
  • CAAR5/1986THE QUEEN v. YEUNG KAM-WAH (D1) AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR8/1986THE QUEEN v. ALBERT STANLEY MALIA
  • CAAR9/1986THE QUEEN v. CHU TAI WAI AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR9/1989THE QUEEN v. CHAN KOON KWOK ARTHUR
  • CACC1000/1976LAI FAT v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC1000/1983THE QUEEN v. LEE HEI KEUNG
  • CACC1001/1979LAW WAI-MING AND ANOTHER v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1972LIU KAM-MAN v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1973LO WAI KEUNG v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1977TAM YUK-MUI (F) v. THE QUEEN
24225-EN-1989-02-02

THE QUEEN v. HUNG YEUK-HUNG

HTML content

HCMA001549/1988

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF HONG KONG

MAGISTRACY CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1549 OF 1988

_____________

BETWEEN

THE QUEEN

AND

HUNG Yeuk-hung

__________

Coram: The Hon. Mr. Justice Wong in Court

Date of Hearing: 2 February 1989

Date of Delivery of Judgment: 2 February 1989

_______________

J U D G M E N T

_______________

 

1. The appellant pleaded guilty before a magistrate to a charge of using an identity card relating to another person contrary to Regulation 12(3) of the Registration of Persons Regulation made under section 7 of the Registration of Persons Ordinance, Cap. 177. She was sentenced to 18 months imprisonment.

2. The facts briefly were that she used the identity card to obtain employment in a restaurant after she had come to Hong Kong illegally. She was not charged with the offence of remaining in Hong Kong without the authority of the Director of Immigration.

3. It was submitted on her behalf that the facts of this case do not justify a departure from the tariff of 15 months laid down in The Queen v. Lau Chung-kwan (1987) HKLR 203. Mr. Tong also referred me to a decision of Bewley J. in The Queen v. Wong "Pik -yu, The Queen v. Lam Tak Fung and The Queen v. Hung Kin Sun Magistracy Appeal Nos. 986, 1036 and 1093 of 1988.

4. I am satisfied that the proper sentence should be one of 15 months imprisonment and allow the appeal to this extent.

 

 

(Michael Wong)

Judge of the High Court

 

 

Representation:

Mr. Alain Sham, Crown Counsel for the Crown

Mr. Louis Tong assigned by D.L.A. for the appellant