HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Magistracy Appeal1988

THE QUEEN v. CHUNG CHI KWAN

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR10/1992THE QUEEN v. WONG MOK DIN
  • CAAR11/1986THE QUEEN v. CHUNG WAI-YIU
  • CAAR12/1986THE QUEEN v. HSU SAI-MAN AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR15/1986THE QUEEN v. WU KAM MING AND OTHERS
  • CAAR15/1987THE QUEEN v. LEUNG WING FAI
  • CAAR16/1987THE QUEEN v. PANG CHEUNG KIM
  • CAAR19/1986THE QUEEN v. CHAN CHI MAN
  • CAAR22/1986THE QUEEN v. WONG TAK-CHI
  • CAAR23/1986THE QUEEN v. MA LAI WU AND OTHERS
  • CAAR4/1986THE QUEEN v. LY XUONG THANH
  • CAAR5/1986THE QUEEN v. YEUNG KAM-WAH (D1) AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR8/1986THE QUEEN v. ALBERT STANLEY MALIA
  • CAAR9/1986THE QUEEN v. CHU TAI WAI AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR9/1989THE QUEEN v. CHAN KOON KWOK ARTHUR
  • CACC1000/1976LAI FAT v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC1000/1983THE QUEEN v. LEE HEI KEUNG
  • CACC1001/1979LAW WAI-MING AND ANOTHER v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1972LIU KAM-MAN v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1973LO WAI KEUNG v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1977TAM YUK-MUI (F) v. THE QUEEN
37091-EN-1988-06-09

THE QUEEN v. CHUNG CHI KWAN

HTML content

HCMA000285/1988

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF HONG KONG

(Appellate Jurisdiction)

MAGISTRACY CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 285 OF 1988

--------------------------

BETWEEN

THE QUEENRespondent
and
CHUNG Chi-KwanAppellant

-----------------------------

Coram: Hon. Bewley, J. in Court

Date of hearing: 9th June 1988

Date of delivery of judgment: 9th June 1988

------------------------

J U D G M E N T

------------------------

 

1. The appellant pleaded guilty to theft before Mr Todd in Fanling Magistrates Court and was sentenced to 18 months' imprisonment.

2. It was another case of pickpocketing on a crowded China-bound train at Sheung Shui station. The victim lost her wallet, containing $143 and other items. The wallet, but not the cash, was recovered.

3. The magistrate noted the degree of prevalence of this offence on trains in his area and also took into account the appellant's record of four previous convictions for theft between 1980 and 1985

4. He gave him such credit as may minimally be given for the defendant's plea on the trial date considering that the defendant had made three prior appearances at Court when the charge had been denied.

5. Mr Marray for the appellant, submits that the plea was changed on the first occasion the appellant was legally represented. That may be so, but the magistrate was entitled to take the view that a plea at that stage does not necessarily indicate remorse. On the other hand, I agree the appellant was entitled to some discount for having saved the court's time.

6. The circumstances of this case are very similar to those in R. v. Hau Tai-wai(l), in which I indicated that the starting point for a sentence in such cases should be 15 months.

7. I allow the appeal and, giving the appellant one month discount for his plea, I reduce the sentence to 14 months' imprisonment.

(E. de B. Bewley)
Judge of the High Court

(1) Mag. App. 769/87

Representation:

Mr M.D. Wilson, Crown Counsel, for Respondent.

Mr John Marray, assigned by D.L.A., for Appellant.