HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Magistracy Appeal1988

KWOK KAM WAH v. THE QUEEN

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR10/1992THE QUEEN v. WONG MOK DIN
  • CAAR11/1986THE QUEEN v. CHUNG WAI-YIU
  • CAAR12/1986THE QUEEN v. HSU SAI-MAN AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR15/1986THE QUEEN v. WU KAM MING AND OTHERS
  • CAAR15/1987THE QUEEN v. LEUNG WING FAI
  • CAAR16/1987THE QUEEN v. PANG CHEUNG KIM
  • CAAR19/1986THE QUEEN v. CHAN CHI MAN
  • CAAR22/1986THE QUEEN v. WONG TAK-CHI
  • CAAR23/1986THE QUEEN v. MA LAI WU AND OTHERS
  • CAAR4/1986THE QUEEN v. LY XUONG THANH
  • CAAR5/1986THE QUEEN v. YEUNG KAM-WAH (D1) AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR8/1986THE QUEEN v. ALBERT STANLEY MALIA
  • CAAR9/1986THE QUEEN v. CHU TAI WAI AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR9/1989THE QUEEN v. CHAN KOON KWOK ARTHUR
  • CACC1000/1976LAI FAT v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC1000/1983THE QUEEN v. LEE HEI KEUNG
  • CACC1001/1979LAW WAI-MING AND ANOTHER v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1972LIU KAM-MAN v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1973LO WAI KEUNG v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1977TAM YUK-MUI (F) v. THE QUEEN
28416-EN-1988-02-12

KWOK KAM WAH v. THE QUEEN

HTML content

HCMA000090/1988

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HONG KONG

( APPELLATE JURISDICTION )

MAGISTRACY APPEAL NO. 90 OF 1988

_____________

BETWEEN

KWOK Kam-wahAppellant
and
The QueenRespondent

____________________

Coram: de Basto, J.

Date of Hearing: 12th February, 1988.

 

_______________

J U D G M E N T

_______________

 

1. The appellant was convicted of careless driving and was sentenced to 3 months' imprisonment and disqualified from holding or obtaining a driving licence for one year. He appealed against the sentence.

2. The appellant is aged 24 and has a clear record. The evidence of PW1 was that he intended to cross the stud-crossing but when he saw the appellant's car coming he decided to let him pass and he said, in effect, he was surprised that the deceased did try to cross at that time. This evidence, which is not disputed, I think very significant.

3. I was told by Counsel for the Crown that he knew of no cases brought by summons for careless driving for an accused to be given an immediate custodial sentence even in cases causing death. On the particular facts of this case especially in view of PW1's evidence I think the sentence was manifestly excessive. The appeal is allowed. I therefore suspend the sentence for a period of two years and fine the appellant $2,000. The order for disqualification to remain.

(Gerald de Baste)
Judge of the High Court

Representation:

Mr L.D.F. Coghlan, Senior Crown Counsel for Crown.

Mr Jimmy KWONG instructed by Messrs. William Sin & So for appellant.