HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Criminal Appeal1989

THE QUEEN v. KU LAI KIN

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR10/1992THE QUEEN v. WONG MOK DIN
  • CAAR11/1986THE QUEEN v. CHUNG WAI-YIU
  • CAAR12/1986THE QUEEN v. HSU SAI-MAN AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR15/1986THE QUEEN v. WU KAM MING AND OTHERS
  • CAAR15/1987THE QUEEN v. LEUNG WING FAI
  • CAAR16/1987THE QUEEN v. PANG CHEUNG KIM
  • CAAR19/1986THE QUEEN v. CHAN CHI MAN
  • CAAR22/1986THE QUEEN v. WONG TAK-CHI
  • CAAR23/1986THE QUEEN v. MA LAI WU AND OTHERS
  • CAAR4/1986THE QUEEN v. LY XUONG THANH
  • CAAR5/1986THE QUEEN v. YEUNG KAM-WAH (D1) AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR8/1986THE QUEEN v. ALBERT STANLEY MALIA
  • CAAR9/1986THE QUEEN v. CHU TAI WAI AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR9/1989THE QUEEN v. CHAN KOON KWOK ARTHUR
  • CACC1000/1976LAI FAT v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC1000/1983THE QUEEN v. LEE HEI KEUNG
  • CACC1001/1979LAW WAI-MING AND ANOTHER v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1972LIU KAM-MAN v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1973LO WAI KEUNG v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1977TAM YUK-MUI (F) v. THE QUEEN
4426-EN-1990-02-16

THE QUEEN v. KU LAI KIN

HTML content

CACC000451/1989

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL1989, No. 451
(Criminal)

BETWEEN

THE QUEEN
AND
KU LAI KIN

-------

Coram: Fuad, V.-P. & Penlington, J.A.

Date of Hearing: 16 February 1990

Date of Judgment: 16 February 1990

-----------------

JUDGMENT

-----------------

 

Fuad, V.-P. (giving the judgment of the Court) :

1. The applicant was sentenced to 4 years' imprisonment on 22nd August last year by His Honour Judge Caird in the District Court after pleading guilty to a charge of possessing dangerous drugs for the purpose of unlawful trafficking.

2. Acting on information, on 8th April last year, the police intercepted the applicant walking near Shatin Pass Road at about noon. When they searched the applicant they found, in a can he was holding, 15 sealed polythene bags of white powder. The white powder turned out, upon analysis, to be dangerous drugs - 102.65 grammes of a mixture containing 6.84 grammes of salts of esters of morphine.

3. In giving his reasons for the sentence he imposed, the trial judge indicated that he had applied the appropriate tariff with a reduction for the plea of guilty. The applicant had 12 previous convictions related to dangerous drugs. It cannot be said that the sentence was too severe in all the circumstances and, therefore, the application is refused.

Representation:

Ku Lai Kin - Applicant in person

Mr. C. Coghlan (Crown Prosecutor) for the Crown/Respondent