HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Magistracy Appeal1989

THE QUEEN v. TAM SIU-MAN

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR10/1992THE QUEEN v. WONG MOK DIN
  • CAAR11/1986THE QUEEN v. CHUNG WAI-YIU
  • CAAR12/1986THE QUEEN v. HSU SAI-MAN AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR15/1986THE QUEEN v. WU KAM MING AND OTHERS
  • CAAR15/1987THE QUEEN v. LEUNG WING FAI
  • CAAR16/1987THE QUEEN v. PANG CHEUNG KIM
  • CAAR19/1986THE QUEEN v. CHAN CHI MAN
  • CAAR22/1986THE QUEEN v. WONG TAK-CHI
  • CAAR23/1986THE QUEEN v. MA LAI WU AND OTHERS
  • CAAR4/1986THE QUEEN v. LY XUONG THANH
  • CAAR5/1986THE QUEEN v. YEUNG KAM-WAH (D1) AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR8/1986THE QUEEN v. ALBERT STANLEY MALIA
  • CAAR9/1986THE QUEEN v. CHU TAI WAI AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR9/1989THE QUEEN v. CHAN KOON KWOK ARTHUR
  • CACC1000/1976LAI FAT v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC1000/1983THE QUEEN v. LEE HEI KEUNG
  • CACC1001/1979LAW WAI-MING AND ANOTHER v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1972LIU KAM-MAN v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1973LO WAI KEUNG v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1977TAM YUK-MUI (F) v. THE QUEEN
24379-EN-1989-10-17

THE QUEEN v. TAM SIU-MAN

HTML content

HCMA001133/1989

IN THE SUPPEME COURT OF HIGH COURT

(Appellate Jurisidction)

MAGISTRACY CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1133 OF 1989

_____________

BETWEEN

THE QUEEN

AND

TAM SIU-MAN

____________

Coram: The Hon. Mr. Justice Barnes in Court

Date of Hearing: 17 October 1989

Date of Delivery of Judgment: 17 October 1989

 

_______________

J U D G M E N T

_______________

 

1. The appellant pleaded guilty to a charge of using an identity card relating to another person contrary to Section 12 of the Registration of Persons Regulations. On the 12th of August, she was asked to produce her identity card by a police officer on road block duties. At the time she was in a taxi which had been stopped in the road block. When the police officer checked the identity card which the appellant produced, he discovered that it was one which had been previously reported to have been lost. When the officer questioned the appellant about it, she admitted that the identity card was not hers that she had come to Hong Kong two weeks earlier by swimming across and that the identity card had been picked up by her somewhere in Kowloon. This was the first time she had come to Hong Kong. She told the magistrate that she was pregnant and that her baby was due in January 1990. She asked to be sent back to China as soon as possible.

2. The magistrate took this plea into consideration, but felt that, since the normal tariff for the offence was imprisonment for 15 months, he could not reduce that sentence by more than 3 months and accordingly sentenced her to imprisonment for 12 months.

3. Mr. Lee, on her behalf today, has put forward several submissions as to why this court on appeal should reduce the sentence even further. It is sufficient to say that I think that it is a strong humanitarian ground that she should desire to have her baby in her native village, and for that reason I would allow the appeal so that she can do so.

4. Accordingly, I allow the appeal quash the sentence and substitute a term of imprisonment for 6 months. According to my calculations, if she gets the normal remission for good behaviour, she should be axle to return to China in December.

(E. C. Barnes)

Judge of the High Court

Representation:

Mr. Steve Chi, S.C.C. for Crown Prosecutor

Lambert Lee instructed by M/s Anthony Kwan & Co. for Appellant: TAM Siu-man