HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Magistracy Appeal1989

THE QUEEN v. WONG CHI CHUEN

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR10/1992THE QUEEN v. WONG MOK DIN
  • CAAR11/1986THE QUEEN v. CHUNG WAI-YIU
  • CAAR12/1986THE QUEEN v. HSU SAI-MAN AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR15/1986THE QUEEN v. WU KAM MING AND OTHERS
  • CAAR15/1987THE QUEEN v. LEUNG WING FAI
  • CAAR16/1987THE QUEEN v. PANG CHEUNG KIM
  • CAAR19/1986THE QUEEN v. CHAN CHI MAN
  • CAAR22/1986THE QUEEN v. WONG TAK-CHI
  • CAAR23/1986THE QUEEN v. MA LAI WU AND OTHERS
  • CAAR4/1986THE QUEEN v. LY XUONG THANH
  • CAAR5/1986THE QUEEN v. YEUNG KAM-WAH (D1) AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR8/1986THE QUEEN v. ALBERT STANLEY MALIA
  • CAAR9/1986THE QUEEN v. CHU TAI WAI AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR9/1989THE QUEEN v. CHAN KOON KWOK ARTHUR
  • CACC1000/1976LAI FAT v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC1000/1983THE QUEEN v. LEE HEI KEUNG
  • CACC1001/1979LAW WAI-MING AND ANOTHER v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1972LIU KAM-MAN v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1973LO WAI KEUNG v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1977TAM YUK-MUI (F) v. THE QUEEN
35930-EN-1989-12-05

THE QUEEN v. WONG CHI CHUEN

HTML content

HCMA001439/1989

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF HONG KONG

(APPELLATE JURISDICTION)

MAGISTRACY CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1438 & 1439 OF 1989

_________

BETWEEN

THE QUEEN
AND
WONG Chi-chuen

____________

Coram: The Hon. Mr. Justice Barnes in Court

Date of Hearing: 5 December 1989

Date of Delivery of Judgment: 5 December 1989

 

_______________

J U D G M E N T

______________

 

1. In this case, I have just given reasons as to why I think that it was quite appropriate for the magistrate to make a disqualification order and that it was quite appropriate for him to take the view that this appellant should not be allowed to drive again until he has passed a test demonstrating his competence to drive.

2. The learned magistrate imposed a disqualification for a period of 12 months but there is no doubt from his statement of findings that his main concern was that this appellant should not be allowed on the roads again until he has properly demonstrated a compentence to drive.

3. I think that the aim which the special magistrate sought to achieve can be obtained in another way without being as harsh on the appellant as the magistrate's order. For that reason I would allow the appeal, quash the disqualification order and substitute, therefor, an order disqualifying him from driving for a period of 3 months. I order that he be further disqualified from the date of expiration of that order until the date on which he passes the test of competence to drive prescribed under the Road Traffic Ordinance. To that extent, the appeal is allowed.

(E.C. Barnes)
Judge of the High Court

Representation:

Mr. Lee Wing-kin (David F.K. Yeung & Co) for Appellant

Mr. Hartmann, C. C. for Crown/Respondent.