HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Magistracy Appeal1989

THE QUEEN v. LI SHU SUM

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR10/1992THE QUEEN v. WONG MOK DIN
  • CAAR11/1986THE QUEEN v. CHUNG WAI-YIU
  • CAAR12/1986THE QUEEN v. HSU SAI-MAN AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR15/1986THE QUEEN v. WU KAM MING AND OTHERS
  • CAAR15/1987THE QUEEN v. LEUNG WING FAI
  • CAAR16/1987THE QUEEN v. PANG CHEUNG KIM
  • CAAR19/1986THE QUEEN v. CHAN CHI MAN
  • CAAR22/1986THE QUEEN v. WONG TAK-CHI
  • CAAR23/1986THE QUEEN v. MA LAI WU AND OTHERS
  • CAAR4/1986THE QUEEN v. LY XUONG THANH
  • CAAR5/1986THE QUEEN v. YEUNG KAM-WAH (D1) AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR8/1986THE QUEEN v. ALBERT STANLEY MALIA
  • CAAR9/1986THE QUEEN v. CHU TAI WAI AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR9/1989THE QUEEN v. CHAN KOON KWOK ARTHUR
  • CACC1000/1976LAI FAT v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC1000/1983THE QUEEN v. LEE HEI KEUNG
  • CACC1001/1979LAW WAI-MING AND ANOTHER v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1972LIU KAM-MAN v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1973LO WAI KEUNG v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1977TAM YUK-MUI (F) v. THE QUEEN
35423-EN-1990-02-21

THE QUEEN v. LI SHU SUM

HTML content

HCMA001500/1989

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF HONG KONG

(APPELLATE JURISDICTON)

MAGISTRACY APPEAL NO. 1500 OF 1989

-----------------

BETWEEN

THE QUEEN

Respondent

 

AND

 

LI SHU SUMAppellant

-----------------

Coram: Hon. Ryan J. in Court

Date of hearing: 21 February 1990

Date of judgment: 21 February 1990

-----------------

JUDGMENT

-----------------

1. In this matter I have given careful consideration to the submissions which were ably made by Mr Wong on behalf of the appellant. I am, however, not convinced that the Magistrate was not entitled to reach the conclusion that he did. I do not find his decision to be unsatisfactory or unsafe and accordingly the appeal is dismissed.

(T. J. Ryan)
Judge of the High Court

Representation:

Mr Schapel, C.C., for Crown

Mr Richard Wong, instructed by Anthony Kwan & Co. for Appellant

Appellant present in Court