HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Magistracy Appeal1989

THE QUEEN v. WONG SIU CHUNG

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR10/1992THE QUEEN v. WONG MOK DIN
  • CAAR11/1986THE QUEEN v. CHUNG WAI-YIU
  • CAAR12/1986THE QUEEN v. HSU SAI-MAN AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR15/1986THE QUEEN v. WU KAM MING AND OTHERS
  • CAAR15/1987THE QUEEN v. LEUNG WING FAI
  • CAAR16/1987THE QUEEN v. PANG CHEUNG KIM
  • CAAR19/1986THE QUEEN v. CHAN CHI MAN
  • CAAR22/1986THE QUEEN v. WONG TAK-CHI
  • CAAR23/1986THE QUEEN v. MA LAI WU AND OTHERS
  • CAAR4/1986THE QUEEN v. LY XUONG THANH
  • CAAR5/1986THE QUEEN v. YEUNG KAM-WAH (D1) AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR8/1986THE QUEEN v. ALBERT STANLEY MALIA
  • CAAR9/1986THE QUEEN v. CHU TAI WAI AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR9/1989THE QUEEN v. CHAN KOON KWOK ARTHUR
  • CACC1000/1976LAI FAT v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC1000/1983THE QUEEN v. LEE HEI KEUNG
  • CACC1001/1979LAW WAI-MING AND ANOTHER v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1972LIU KAM-MAN v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1973LO WAI KEUNG v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1977TAM YUK-MUI (F) v. THE QUEEN
30246-EN-1990-03-15

THE QUEEN v. WONG SIU CHUNG

HTML content

HCMA001599/1989

Headnote

Sentence - illegal immigrants - defendant a teenager - special considerations to be given.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF HONG KONG

MAGISTRACY APPEAL NO.1599/89

 

------------------

BETWEEN

THE QUEEN

AND

WONG Siu-chung

-------------------

Coram: Hon. Yang, C.J.

Date of Hearing: 15 March 1990

Date of Judgment: 15 March 1990

 

-----------------

JUDGMENT

-----------------

Hon. Yang, C.J.:

1. In this case the appellant was convicted on his own plea of using an identity card relating to another person. He was an illegal immigrant from China.   For a young woman, 20 years of age, I reduced the sentence from 15 months to 12 months in a case earlier this morning where the offence was one of remaining in Hong Kong without authority.  Here we have a boy of 17 years of age at the time of the offence.

2. My attention is drawn to the Attorney General v. Lam Ping-chun 1988 No. 10 Application for Review which awarded a sentence of 12 months after discount on a boy of 18. My sentence in the previous case, namely Magistracy Appeal No. 1591/89, was therefore too low. I think, however, that for defendants under 18 years of age, very special considerations should he given. I would accordingly allow the appeal and reduce the sentence to 9 months.

T.L. Yang
Chief Justice

Representation:

Mr. Steve Chui for Crown/Respondent

Mr. Wong Siu-chung Appellant in person