HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Magistracy Appeal1989

THE QUEEN v. KWOK SIU-LAM

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR10/1992THE QUEEN v. WONG MOK DIN
  • CAAR11/1986THE QUEEN v. CHUNG WAI-YIU
  • CAAR12/1986THE QUEEN v. HSU SAI-MAN AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR15/1986THE QUEEN v. WU KAM MING AND OTHERS
  • CAAR15/1987THE QUEEN v. LEUNG WING FAI
  • CAAR16/1987THE QUEEN v. PANG CHEUNG KIM
  • CAAR19/1986THE QUEEN v. CHAN CHI MAN
  • CAAR22/1986THE QUEEN v. WONG TAK-CHI
  • CAAR23/1986THE QUEEN v. MA LAI WU AND OTHERS
  • CAAR4/1986THE QUEEN v. LY XUONG THANH
  • CAAR5/1986THE QUEEN v. YEUNG KAM-WAH (D1) AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR8/1986THE QUEEN v. ALBERT STANLEY MALIA
  • CAAR9/1986THE QUEEN v. CHU TAI WAI AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR9/1989THE QUEEN v. CHAN KOON KWOK ARTHUR
  • CACC1000/1976LAI FAT v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC1000/1983THE QUEEN v. LEE HEI KEUNG
  • CACC1001/1979LAW WAI-MING AND ANOTHER v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1972LIU KAM-MAN v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1973LO WAI KEUNG v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1977TAM YUK-MUI (F) v. THE QUEEN
25470-EN-1989-06-29

THE QUEEN v. KWOK SIU-LAM

HTML content

HCMA000714/1989

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF HONG KONG

(Appellate Jurisdiction)

MAGISTRACY CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 714 OF 1989

______________

BETWEEN

THE QUEEN

Respondent

 

AND

 

KWOK Siu-lam

Appellant

___________

Coram: Hon. Bewley, J. in Court

Date of hearing: 29 June 1989

Date of delivery of judgment: 29 June 1989

 

--------------------

J U D G M E N T

---------------------

 

1. The appellant pleaded guilty to remaining in Hong Kong withour authority, contrary to Section 38(1)(b) of the Immigration ordinance, Cap. 115, and was sentenced to two years imprisoment.

2. This is his third illicit visit in four years. He has two previous convictions for using the identity card of another person.

3. There are therefore aggravating factors which justify a higher sentence than the normal 15 months. Nevertheless, I feel a two year sentence is too severe and reduce it to one of 21 months.

4. The appeal is allowed accordingly.

(E. de B. Bewley)

Judge of the High Court

Representation:

Mr P. Li, Crown Counsel, for Crown

Appellant in person