HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Magistracy Appeal1989

THE QUEEN v. TANG YIN-MEI

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR10/1992THE QUEEN v. WONG MOK DIN
  • CAAR11/1986THE QUEEN v. CHUNG WAI-YIU
  • CAAR12/1986THE QUEEN v. HSU SAI-MAN AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR15/1986THE QUEEN v. WU KAM MING AND OTHERS
  • CAAR15/1987THE QUEEN v. LEUNG WING FAI
  • CAAR16/1987THE QUEEN v. PANG CHEUNG KIM
  • CAAR19/1986THE QUEEN v. CHAN CHI MAN
  • CAAR22/1986THE QUEEN v. WONG TAK-CHI
  • CAAR23/1986THE QUEEN v. MA LAI WU AND OTHERS
  • CAAR4/1986THE QUEEN v. LY XUONG THANH
  • CAAR5/1986THE QUEEN v. YEUNG KAM-WAH (D1) AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR8/1986THE QUEEN v. ALBERT STANLEY MALIA
  • CAAR9/1986THE QUEEN v. CHU TAI WAI AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR9/1989THE QUEEN v. CHAN KOON KWOK ARTHUR
  • CACC1000/1976LAI FAT v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC1000/1983THE QUEEN v. LEE HEI KEUNG
  • CACC1001/1979LAW WAI-MING AND ANOTHER v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1972LIU KAM-MAN v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1973LO WAI KEUNG v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1977TAM YUK-MUI (F) v. THE QUEEN
35905-EN-1989-09-01

THE QUEEN v. TANG YIN-MEI

HTML content

HCMA000761/1989

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF HONG KONG

(APPELLATE JURISDICTION)

MAGISTRACY APPEAL NO. 761 OF 1989

____________________________________

BETWEEN

The Queen

Respondent

AND

TANG Yin-mei

Appellant

Coram: de Basto, J.

Date of hearing: 1 August & 1 September 1989

Date of judgment: 1 September 1989

 

----------------------

J U D G M E N T

----------------------

 

1. The appellant who is aged 16 pleaded guilty to 4 robberies - the victims were aged between 13 and 16. These robberies were committed by the appellant with other young persons.

2. The probation report was unfavourable. The magistrate very properly sent her to a Training Centre.

3. The appellant has been in custody for 4 months - she is pregnant and is expected to give birth in December. On purely humanitarian grounds I allow the appeal and substitute therefore a sentence of 1 year's imprisonment suspended for 2 years.

(Gerald de Basto)

Judge of the High Court

Representation:

Mr P.K. Madigan, Sr Crown Counsel for Crown.

Mr Tse Hon instructed by Messrs. Leo K.W. Lok & Co. for appellant.