HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Magistracy Appeal1990

THE QUEEN v. CHAN WAI KWOK

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR10/1992THE QUEEN v. WONG MOK DIN
  • CAAR11/1986THE QUEEN v. CHUNG WAI-YIU
  • CAAR12/1986THE QUEEN v. HSU SAI-MAN AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR15/1986THE QUEEN v. WU KAM MING AND OTHERS
  • CAAR15/1987THE QUEEN v. LEUNG WING FAI
  • CAAR16/1987THE QUEEN v. PANG CHEUNG KIM
  • CAAR19/1986THE QUEEN v. CHAN CHI MAN
  • CAAR22/1986THE QUEEN v. WONG TAK-CHI
  • CAAR23/1986THE QUEEN v. MA LAI WU AND OTHERS
  • CAAR4/1986THE QUEEN v. LY XUONG THANH
  • CAAR5/1986THE QUEEN v. YEUNG KAM-WAH (D1) AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR8/1986THE QUEEN v. ALBERT STANLEY MALIA
  • CAAR9/1986THE QUEEN v. CHU TAI WAI AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR9/1989THE QUEEN v. CHAN KOON KWOK ARTHUR
  • CACC1000/1976LAI FAT v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC1000/1983THE QUEEN v. LEE HEI KEUNG
  • CACC1001/1979LAW WAI-MING AND ANOTHER v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1972LIU KAM-MAN v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1973LO WAI KEUNG v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1977TAM YUK-MUI (F) v. THE QUEEN
24709-EN-1991-04-11

THE QUEEN v. CHAN WAI KWOK

HTML content

HCMA000963/1990

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF HONG KONG

(Appellate Jurisdiction)

MAGISTRACY CRIAINAL APPEAL NO.963 OF 1990

_________

BETWEEN

THE QUEENRespondent
AND
CHAN WAI KWOK (D1)Appellant

______________

Coram: The Hon. Mr. Justice Barnes in Court

Date of Hearing: 11 April 1991

Date of Delivery of Judgment: 11 April 1991

 

-----------------

JUDGMENT

-----------------

1. The appellant was convicted on his own plea on charges of (a) tampering with a motor vehicle; (b) possession of an instrument fit for unlawful purpose; and (c) remaining in Hong Kong without authority.

2. He is 32 years of age with no previous convictions but he had made one previous attempt to come to Hong Kong unlawfully.

3. The learned magistrate sentenced him to imprisonment on the (a) charge to imprisonment for 2 months on the (b) charge to imprisonment for 1 month concurrent with the sentence on (a), and on (c) imprisonment for 15 months consecutive to (a) making a total of 17 months.

4. The appellant has appealed against the sentences but informs me that he has no complaint about either the individual sentences themselves or the totality of them. He merely wishes tone given credit for time spent in custody whilst the circumstances of his coming to Hong Kong were investigated by the immigration Department. He spent some 10 days in custody whilst this investigation was going on and of course that period is not taken into account when the Correctional Services Department calculates the time of his release.

5. In order to give him credit for that period that he spent in custody I propose to alter the sentence on the (c) charges to 14 1/2 months.

6. The appeal is allowed to that extent so that he will serve an effective period of 16 1/2 months.

(E.C. Barnes)
Judge of the High Court

Representation:

Mr. S.R. Bailey S.C.C. f or Crown

Appellant: Chan Wai Kwok in person