HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Magistracy Appeal1991

THE QUEEN v. TSE CHOI SHING

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR10/1992THE QUEEN v. WONG MOK DIN
  • CAAR11/1986THE QUEEN v. CHUNG WAI-YIU
  • CAAR12/1986THE QUEEN v. HSU SAI-MAN AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR15/1986THE QUEEN v. WU KAM MING AND OTHERS
  • CAAR15/1987THE QUEEN v. LEUNG WING FAI
  • CAAR16/1987THE QUEEN v. PANG CHEUNG KIM
  • CAAR19/1986THE QUEEN v. CHAN CHI MAN
  • CAAR22/1986THE QUEEN v. WONG TAK-CHI
  • CAAR23/1986THE QUEEN v. MA LAI WU AND OTHERS
  • CAAR4/1986THE QUEEN v. LY XUONG THANH
  • CAAR5/1986THE QUEEN v. YEUNG KAM-WAH (D1) AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR8/1986THE QUEEN v. ALBERT STANLEY MALIA
  • CAAR9/1986THE QUEEN v. CHU TAI WAI AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR9/1989THE QUEEN v. CHAN KOON KWOK ARTHUR
  • CACC1000/1976LAI FAT v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC1000/1983THE QUEEN v. LEE HEI KEUNG
  • CACC1001/1979LAW WAI-MING AND ANOTHER v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1972LIU KAM-MAN v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1973LO WAI KEUNG v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1977TAM YUK-MUI (F) v. THE QUEEN
25925-EN-1992-04-23

THE QUEEN v. TSE CHOI SHING

HTML content

HCMA001048/1991

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF HONG KONG

(Appellate Jurisdiction)

MAGISTRACY CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1048 OF 1991

--------------

BETWEEN

THE QUEEN
AND
TSE CHOI SHING

-------------

Coram: Hon. Penlington, J.A. in Court (sitting as an additional High Court Judge)

Date of hearing: 23 April 1992

Date of delivery of judgment: 23 April 1992

 

------------------------

J U D G M E N T

------------------------

 

1. This is an appeal against sentence of 18 months' imprisonment passed for remaining in Hong Kong without the authority of the Director of Immigration. The appellant was found on board a vessel on the 29th September 1991 having illegally entered Hong Kong waters on the previous day.

2. The reason for the passing of the appellant being charged and for the sentence is that he has three previous convictions, two for unlawfully remaining in Hong Kong and one for uttering a forged identity card. He pleaded guilty to the offence, not at the first instance however, but only after on one appearance alleging that he did not have any previous convictions.

3. He has told me today that he came to Hong Kong in order to withdraw monies from a bank account in Yuen Long. Nothing about that was said to the magistrate and no bank documents were found on him when he was arrested.I do not believe him.

4. I am satisfied that the sentence passed was perfectly proper, if not lenient, and the appeal is dismissed.

 

 

(R.G. Penlington)
Justice of Appeal

Representation:

Appellant, Tse Choi Sing, in person

Paul Leung for Crown