HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Magistracy Appeal1991

THE QUEEN v. POON LAI LING

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR10/1992THE QUEEN v. WONG MOK DIN
  • CAAR11/1986THE QUEEN v. CHUNG WAI-YIU
  • CAAR12/1986THE QUEEN v. HSU SAI-MAN AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR15/1986THE QUEEN v. WU KAM MING AND OTHERS
  • CAAR15/1987THE QUEEN v. LEUNG WING FAI
  • CAAR16/1987THE QUEEN v. PANG CHEUNG KIM
  • CAAR19/1986THE QUEEN v. CHAN CHI MAN
  • CAAR22/1986THE QUEEN v. WONG TAK-CHI
  • CAAR23/1986THE QUEEN v. MA LAI WU AND OTHERS
  • CAAR4/1986THE QUEEN v. LY XUONG THANH
  • CAAR5/1986THE QUEEN v. YEUNG KAM-WAH (D1) AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR8/1986THE QUEEN v. ALBERT STANLEY MALIA
  • CAAR9/1986THE QUEEN v. CHU TAI WAI AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR9/1989THE QUEEN v. CHAN KOON KWOK ARTHUR
  • CACC1000/1976LAI FAT v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC1000/1983THE QUEEN v. LEE HEI KEUNG
  • CACC1001/1979LAW WAI-MING AND ANOTHER v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1972LIU KAM-MAN v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1973LO WAI KEUNG v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1977TAM YUK-MUI (F) v. THE QUEEN
26220-EN-1991-07-24

THE QUEEN v. POON LAI LING

HTML content

HCMA000298/1991

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF HONG KONG

(Appellate Jurisdiction)

MAGISTRACY CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 298 OF 1991

____________

BETWEEN

THE QUEEN

AND

POON LAI LING

___________

Coram: Hon. Barnes, J. in Court

Date of Hearing: 24 July 1991

Date of Delivery of Judgment: 24 July 1991

 

_____________

J U D G M E N T

_____________

1. The appellant pleaded guilty to two charges, one of using an identity card relating to another person, contrary to a provision of the Registration of Persons Ordinance, and other with remaining in Hong Kong without the authority of the Director of Immigration, after having landed unlawfully in Hong Kong contrary to a provision of the Immigration Ordinance.

2. The learned Magistrate sentenced her to 15 months imprisonment on each charge, the sentences to be served concurrently. In his Reasons for Sentence the learned

3. Magistrate said that he passed those sentences as he could not find anything in the case to justify a departure from the usual sentence.

4. In her appeal against sentence, the appellant has put before me nothing which would justify my saying that those sentences were excessive or improper.

5. Before me, however, the appellant has tendered certain documents which are certificates bearing the chops of a hospital in China, to the effect that her father is suffering from terminal lung cancer. I propose to allow her appeal so that she can immediately return home to see her father, but I propose to substitute for the sentence, a sentence which will take account of the period that she has already served, but which will be suspended, so that if she does come back again, she will have to serve the remainder of the originally passed sentence together with whatever sentence is passed on her return.

6. I, accordingly, allow the appeal, quash the sentence and substitute therefor a sentence of imprisonment for 10 months to be suspended for 18 months.

(E.C. Barnes)
Judge of the High Court

Representation:

Mr. Paul Leung, C.C. for Crown.

Appellant: POON Lai-ling in Person.