HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Magistracy Appeal1991

THE QUEEN v. TANG PING YIU

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR10/1992THE QUEEN v. WONG MOK DIN
  • CAAR11/1986THE QUEEN v. CHUNG WAI-YIU
  • CAAR12/1986THE QUEEN v. HSU SAI-MAN AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR15/1986THE QUEEN v. WU KAM MING AND OTHERS
  • CAAR15/1987THE QUEEN v. LEUNG WING FAI
  • CAAR16/1987THE QUEEN v. PANG CHEUNG KIM
  • CAAR19/1986THE QUEEN v. CHAN CHI MAN
  • CAAR22/1986THE QUEEN v. WONG TAK-CHI
  • CAAR23/1986THE QUEEN v. MA LAI WU AND OTHERS
  • CAAR4/1986THE QUEEN v. LY XUONG THANH
  • CAAR5/1986THE QUEEN v. YEUNG KAM-WAH (D1) AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR8/1986THE QUEEN v. ALBERT STANLEY MALIA
  • CAAR9/1986THE QUEEN v. CHU TAI WAI AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR9/1989THE QUEEN v. CHAN KOON KWOK ARTHUR
  • CACC1000/1976LAI FAT v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC1000/1983THE QUEEN v. LEE HEI KEUNG
  • CACC1001/1979LAW WAI-MING AND ANOTHER v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1972LIU KAM-MAN v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1973LO WAI KEUNG v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1977TAM YUK-MUI (F) v. THE QUEEN
24692-EN-1991-04-12

THE QUEEN v. TANG PING YIU

HTML content

HCMA000044/1991

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF HONG KONG

APPELLATE JURISDICTION

MAGISTRACY APPEAL NO. 44 OF 1991

____________

BETWEEN

THE QUEEN

Respondent

AND
TANG PING YIU

Appellant

____________

Coram: The Hon. Mr. Justice Barnes in Court

Date of Hearing: 12 April 1991

Date of Delivery of Judgment: 12 April 1991

 

----------------

JUDGMENT

----------------

1. The appellant was convicted after trial in the Magistrates Court on a charge of using the identity card of another person. On conviction, he was sentenced to imprisonment for 14 months.

2. On his appeal against sentence he is relying on a humanitarian ground which was not put before the learned magistrate, because the ground was not known to the appellant at that time. There is now put before me a certificate purportedly under the seal of the Shipai Hospital in Dongguan City in Guangdong province in which it is said that Tang Yuk Chee, who is said to be the appellant's father and who is 66 years old, has been diagnosed as suffering from terminal liver cancer.

3. I am allowing his appeal, and so that he can be released from prison and go back to see his father. He was sentenced in November so he has already served a period of the sentence. What I propose to do is to quash that sentence and substitute another, the effect of which will be that he will be released but if he does return again he will still go to prison for the balance of the period he should have served for this offence.

4. I, therefore, allow the appeal, quash the sentence and substitute, therefore, a sentence of imprisonment for 8 months and I propose to suspend that sentence for 18 months.

(E.C. Barnes)
Judge of the High Court

Representation:

Mr. Forlin, C.C. for Crown

Mr. Frank Wong (D.C.A.) for Appellant: Tang Ping Yiu