HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Criminal Appeal1992

R. v. VU DINH PHONG alias TRUONG MINH TUAN

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR10/1994R. v. CHING WAI FAN, CARINA
  • CAAR12/1994R. v. TUEN Shui Ming and Another
  • CAAR13/1993R. v. WONG SHU KAN
  • CAAR3/1993R. v. NG SHEUNG CHUN
  • CAAR3/1995R. v. YU YUN HEI
  • CAAR5/1993R. v. KWOK CHI KEUNG
  • CAAR5/1995R. v. LEUNG KWOK CHUNG
  • CAAR9/1995R. v. CHAN SIU YUN
  • CACC100/1993NG YUK HUNG and Others v. R.
  • CACC100/1995R. v. CHAN LAM
  • CACC100/1996R. v. LI CHI MING
  • CACC101/1994CHAN CHONG HEI v. R.
  • CACC10/1994TAM Shing-li v. R.
  • CACC10/1996R. v. AU YEUNG CHI MAN
  • CACC102/1993LEE WING ON v. R.
  • CACC102/1994R. v. CHEUNG KIN SHING and Others
  • CACC102/1995R. v. LAI FOR-SHUN and Another
  • CACC102/1996R. v. CHOI MAN HAY
  • CACC103/1994CHAN KWOK-HING v. R.
  • CACC103/1996R. v. FUNG CHI SHING and Another
3628-EN-1993-01-15

R. v. VU DINH PHONG alias TRUONG MINH TUAN

HTML content

CACC000375/1992

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL

1992, No 375
(Criminal)

____________

BETWEEN
THE QUEEN

and

VU DINH PHONG alias TRUONG MINH TUAN

____________

Coram: Hon Kempster and Macdougall, JJA

Date of hearing: 15 January 1993

Date of judgment: 15 January 1993

_______________

J U D G M E N T

_______________

Kempster, JA:

1. This is the judgment of the Court.

2. On 25 August 1992 in the District Court Vu Dinh-phong was convicted on two charges of burglary by His Honour Judge Kilgour and sentenced to 2½ years' imprisonment on each; those sentences to run concurrently but to commence on the completion of an existing term of 4 years' imprisonment which he was serving. Against those sentences he seeks leave to appeal on no very distinct grounds save that he feels he will, if the sentences stand, have spent a protracted period behind bars before his release. This morning he has told us, as we accept, of the particular difficulties of Vietnamese boat people in this territory and of his own particular circumstances.

3. The offences in question took place during June and July 1992 in a supermarket and in a Chinese medicine shop in Tsuen Wan and involved overall some S91,000 in cash and wines, spirits, tobacco, ginseng and antler products said to be worth some $200,000.

4. The judge took into account the applicant's rather tardy plea of guilty and the overall period of imprisonment he would have to serve. As we see it, the applicant, who cannot lay claim to a clear record, played for high stakes and lost. His application for leave to appeal against sentence must be refused.

(Michael Kempster)(Neil Macdougall)
Justice of AppealJustice of Appeal

Representation:

C.D.F. Coghlan (Senior Crown Counsel) for the Crown

Applicant in person