HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Criminal Appeal1993

NG HON MING v. R.

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR10/1994R. v. CHING WAI FAN, CARINA
  • CAAR12/1994R. v. TUEN Shui Ming and Another
  • CAAR13/1993R. v. WONG SHU KAN
  • CAAR3/1993R. v. NG SHEUNG CHUN
  • CAAR3/1995R. v. YU YUN HEI
  • CAAR5/1993R. v. KWOK CHI KEUNG
  • CAAR5/1995R. v. LEUNG KWOK CHUNG
  • CAAR9/1995R. v. CHAN SIU YUN
  • CACC100/1993NG YUK HUNG and Others v. R.
  • CACC100/1995R. v. CHAN LAM
  • CACC100/1996R. v. LI CHI MING
  • CACC101/1994CHAN CHONG HEI v. R.
  • CACC10/1994TAM Shing-li v. R.
  • CACC10/1996R. v. AU YEUNG CHI MAN
  • CACC102/1993LEE WING ON v. R.
  • CACC102/1994R. v. CHEUNG KIN SHING and Others
  • CACC102/1995R. v. LAI FOR-SHUN and Another
  • CACC102/1996R. v. CHOI MAN HAY
  • CACC103/1994CHAN KWOK-HING v. R.
  • CACC103/1996R. v. FUNG CHI SHING and Another
3802-EN-1994-04-13

NG HON MING v. R.

HTML content

CACC000392/1993

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL

1993, No. 392
(Criminal)

______________

BETWEEN
THE QUEEN
AND
NG HON MING

______________

 

Coram: Hon Penlington, Nazareth and Litton, JJ.A.

Date of hearing: 13 April 1994

Date of judgment: 13 April 1994

_______________

J U D G M E M T

_______________

Litton, J.A. giving the judgment of the court:

1. This is an application for leave to appeal against a sentence of four years' imprisonment.

2. This applicant, Ng Hon-ming, was convicted on 1 July 1993 on one charge laid under section 37C(1)(a) of the Immigration Ordinance in that he was a member of the crew of a ship which entered Hong Kong with unauthorised entrants on board. The offence took place on 3 October 1992 when a ship called "Wai Loi 364" entered Hong Kong with 17 unauthorised entrants. It was proved at the trial that the applicant was a crew member on board the ship. All the passengers came from China and were unauthorised entrants.

3. This court has dealt with a large number of similar cases. The district judge on this occasion sentenced the applicant to four years' imprisonment which is well within the normal tariff for an offence of this nature. Taking into account the fact that there were 17 unauthorised passengers on board, it would appear to us that the sentence of four years is not manifestly excessive. The application for leave to appeal against sentence must therefore be refused.

(R.G. Penlington)(G.P. Nazareth)(Henry Litton)
Justice of AppealJustice of AppealJustice of Appeal

Representation:

Applicant in person

D.G. Saw (Crown Prosecutor) for Crown/Respondent