HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Criminal Appeal1994

LEUNG CHO KUEN v. R.

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR10/1994R. v. CHING WAI FAN, CARINA
  • CAAR12/1994R. v. TUEN Shui Ming and Another
  • CAAR13/1993R. v. WONG SHU KAN
  • CAAR3/1993R. v. NG SHEUNG CHUN
  • CAAR3/1995R. v. YU YUN HEI
  • CAAR5/1993R. v. KWOK CHI KEUNG
  • CAAR5/1995R. v. LEUNG KWOK CHUNG
  • CAAR9/1995R. v. CHAN SIU YUN
  • CACC100/1993NG YUK HUNG and Others v. R.
  • CACC100/1995R. v. CHAN LAM
  • CACC100/1996R. v. LI CHI MING
  • CACC101/1994CHAN CHONG HEI v. R.
  • CACC10/1994TAM Shing-li v. R.
  • CACC10/1996R. v. AU YEUNG CHI MAN
  • CACC102/1993LEE WING ON v. R.
  • CACC102/1994R. v. CHEUNG KIN SHING and Others
  • CACC102/1995R. v. LAI FOR-SHUN and Another
  • CACC102/1996R. v. CHOI MAN HAY
  • CACC103/1994CHAN KWOK-HING v. R.
  • CACC103/1996R. v. FUNG CHI SHING and Another
2266-EN-1994-08-12

LEUNG CHO KUEN v. R.

HTML content

CACC000025/1994

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL

1994, No. 25
(Criminal)

___________

BETWEEN
THE QUEEN
AND
LEUNG CHO KUEN

___________

Coram: Hon Macdougall, V.-P. and Litton, J.A.

Date of hearing: 12 August 1994

Date of judgment: 12 August 1994

_______________

J U D G M E N T

_______________

 

Litton, J.A. giving the judgment of the court:

1. This is an application for leave to appeal against sentence. The applicant was convicted in the High Court on three charges of robbery for which the judge, Mr Justice Patrick Chan, sentenced him to a total of eight years' imprisonment, those sentences to run concurrently with a sentence for trafficking in dangerous drugs which the applicant was then serving.

2. The three offences bore considerable similarity. In each the applicant had a confederate. They forced their way into domestic premises, tied the victims up, threatened them with weapons and ransacked the premises.

3. In relation to the first two offences cash and gold ornaments were stolen. It seems to us that the total sentence of eight years was a merciful one.

In our judgment the sentence was a proper one. This application for leave to appeal against that sentence is frivolous. In dismissing this application we order that the applicant should also incur a loss of time of three months.

(Neil Macdougall)(Henry Litton)
Vice PresidentJustice of Appeal

Representation:

Mr William Lam (Crown Prosecutor) for Respondent

Applicant - LEUNG Cho-kuen - in person