HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Criminal Appeal1994

R. v. LI KAM CHEUNG

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR10/1994R. v. CHING WAI FAN, CARINA
  • CAAR12/1994R. v. TUEN Shui Ming and Another
  • CAAR13/1993R. v. WONG SHU KAN
  • CAAR3/1993R. v. NG SHEUNG CHUN
  • CAAR3/1995R. v. YU YUN HEI
  • CAAR5/1993R. v. KWOK CHI KEUNG
  • CAAR5/1995R. v. LEUNG KWOK CHUNG
  • CAAR9/1995R. v. CHAN SIU YUN
  • CACC100/1993NG YUK HUNG and Others v. R.
  • CACC100/1995R. v. CHAN LAM
  • CACC100/1996R. v. LI CHI MING
  • CACC101/1994CHAN CHONG HEI v. R.
  • CACC10/1994TAM Shing-li v. R.
  • CACC10/1996R. v. AU YEUNG CHI MAN
  • CACC102/1993LEE WING ON v. R.
  • CACC102/1994R. v. CHEUNG KIN SHING and Others
  • CACC102/1995R. v. LAI FOR-SHUN and Another
  • CACC102/1996R. v. CHOI MAN HAY
  • CACC103/1994CHAN KWOK-HING v. R.
  • CACC103/1996R. v. FUNG CHI SHING and Another
3204-EN-1995-02-22

R. v. LI KAM CHEUNG

HTML content

CACC000335/1994

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL

1994, No. 335
(Criminal)

_____________

 

BETWEEN
THE QUEEN
and
LI KAM CHEUNG

_____________

 

Coram : Hon. Yang, C.J., Penlington, and Liu, JJ.A.

Date of hearing : 22 February 1995

Date of judgment : 22 February 1995

_____________________

J U D G M E N T

_____________________

Penlington, J.A. (giving the judgment of the Court):

1. This is an application for leave to appeal against conviction and sentence on charges of indecent assault and attempted rape. The application for leave to appeal against conviction is some three months out of time.

2. We considered the facts of this matter which were agreed the time of the applicant's plea of guilty and the reasons given in the applicant's affidavit for leave to appeal out of time which were that he had been advised by fellow prisoners to do so. We are satisfied that there is no grounds upon which we should extend the time for leave to appeal against conviction. That application is therefore refused.

3. We have also considered the sentences passed of 4 years' imprisonment for the indecent assault and 6 years' imprisonment on each of the charges of attempted rape. It is enough to say that the victim in this case, at the time of the first offence, was only 12 years of age and the applicant was in a position of trust in that he was living with the victim's mother. These were sample offences only and reflect a course of conduct going on for over 2 years.

4. We are satisfied that the sentences were perfectly proper. The application for leave to appeal is also refused.

(T.L. Yang)(R.G. Penlington)(B. Liu)
Chief JusticeJustice of AppealJustice of Appeal

Representation:

The applicant - in person

Mr. D.G. Saw, S.A.C.P., for the Crown