R. v. CHEUNG YIU KWAN

CACC000387/1994

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL

1994, No. 387
(Criminal)

_______________

 

BETWEEN
	THE QUEEN	Respondent
	AND
	CHEUNG YIU KWAN	Applicant

_______________

 

Coram: Hon Litton, V.-P., Bokhary and Mayo, JJ.A.

Date of hearing: 27 June 1995

Date of judgment: 27 June 1995

_________________

J U D G M E N T

_________________

Mayo, J.A. (giving the judgment of the Court):

1. The applicant pleaded guilty to the offence of indecently assaulting a child under the age of 16. He was sentenced to 18 months' imprisonment. He appeals against this sentence.

2. The surrounding circumstances of the offence are distasteful and serious.

3. On 10 January 1994 he approached the victim a boy of almost 14 years of age in the street and accused him of theft. He insisted that the boy accompany him to a secluded area at the carpark at Lai On Estate at Shamshuipo on the pretext of searching him for his wallet.

4. When they got there he masturbated the boy and then demanded that the boy should masturbate him. When he declined to do so the applicant punched him in the face.

5. The boy reported the incident to his aunt who in turn made a report to the police.

6. The applicant surrendered himself to the police and confessed to the offence.

7. The two grounds of appeal are that Deputy Judge Souyave failed to obtain a psychiatric report and had insufficient background information concerning the applicant.

8. Unfortunately the applicant has a bad record. He had two previous convictions for indecent assaults and various other convictions.

9. Indeed at the time when Deputy Judge Souyave passed sentence the applicant was receiving treatment at Siu Lam as a result of an earlier conviction for the same type of offence. In these circumstances it is not surprising that further background material was not called for.

10. What is undoubtedly true is that the public at large needs to be protected from this sort of behaviour. The sentence was certainly not wrong in principle or manifestly excessive and the application for leave to appeal must be dismissed.

Representation:

Mr J. To for Crown Prosecutor

Mr Peter Wan (DLA) for Applicant