HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Criminal Appeal1994

R. v. TSANG KWOK KWONG

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR10/1994R. v. CHING WAI FAN, CARINA
  • CAAR12/1994R. v. TUEN Shui Ming and Another
  • CAAR13/1993R. v. WONG SHU KAN
  • CAAR3/1993R. v. NG SHEUNG CHUN
  • CAAR3/1995R. v. YU YUN HEI
  • CAAR5/1993R. v. KWOK CHI KEUNG
  • CAAR5/1995R. v. LEUNG KWOK CHUNG
  • CAAR9/1995R. v. CHAN SIU YUN
  • CACC100/1993NG YUK HUNG and Others v. R.
  • CACC100/1995R. v. CHAN LAM
  • CACC100/1996R. v. LI CHI MING
  • CACC101/1994CHAN CHONG HEI v. R.
  • CACC10/1994TAM Shing-li v. R.
  • CACC10/1996R. v. AU YEUNG CHI MAN
  • CACC102/1993LEE WING ON v. R.
  • CACC102/1994R. v. CHEUNG KIN SHING and Others
  • CACC102/1995R. v. LAI FOR-SHUN and Another
  • CACC102/1996R. v. CHOI MAN HAY
  • CACC103/1994CHAN KWOK-HING v. R.
  • CACC103/1996R. v. FUNG CHI SHING and Another
4580-EN-1995-02-07

R. v. TSANG KWOK KWONG

HTML content

CACC000467/1994

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL

1994, No. 467
(Criminal)

_____________

 

BETWEEN
THE QUEEN
and
TSANG KWOK KWONG

_____________

 

Coram : Hon Macdougall, V.-P., Penlington and Liu, JJ.A.

Date of hearing : 7 February 1995

Date of judgment : 7 February 1995

______________________

J U D G M E N T

______________________

Liu, J.A. (giving the judgment of the Court):

1. The applicant confines himself to an application for leave to appeal against sentence. He was convicted on two charges: both trafficking in a dangerous drug. Because of the quantities involved, namely, 11.62 grammes and 114.62 grammes of salts of esters of morphine respectively, he was sentenced to six years' imprisonment in the 1st charge and ten years' imprisonment in the 2nd.

2. The guidelines, as laid down by a differently constituted Court of Appeal, provide for a term of imprisonment of five to eight years for the quantity in the 1st charge and eight to twelve years for the quantity in the 2nd charge.

3. We have taken into consideration what has been stated in the applicant's letter to the Judiciary Administrator and all the matters he has advanced before us including the plea he has made this morning. We do not find the sentences imposed upon the applicant too severe or wrong in principle. The applicant's application for leave to appeal against the sentence is therefore denied.

(Neil Macdougall)(R G Penlington)(B Liu)
Vice PresidentJustice of AppealJustice of Appeal

Representation:

Appellant in person

Mr D. G. Saw (Crown Prosecutor) for the respondent