HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Criminal Appeal1994

R. v. CHAN CHI HING

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR10/1994R. v. CHING WAI FAN, CARINA
  • CAAR12/1994R. v. TUEN Shui Ming and Another
  • CAAR13/1993R. v. WONG SHU KAN
  • CAAR3/1993R. v. NG SHEUNG CHUN
  • CAAR3/1995R. v. YU YUN HEI
  • CAAR5/1993R. v. KWOK CHI KEUNG
  • CAAR5/1995R. v. LEUNG KWOK CHUNG
  • CAAR9/1995R. v. CHAN SIU YUN
  • CACC100/1993NG YUK HUNG and Others v. R.
  • CACC100/1995R. v. CHAN LAM
  • CACC100/1996R. v. LI CHI MING
  • CACC101/1994CHAN CHONG HEI v. R.
  • CACC10/1994TAM Shing-li v. R.
  • CACC10/1996R. v. AU YEUNG CHI MAN
  • CACC102/1993LEE WING ON v. R.
  • CACC102/1994R. v. CHEUNG KIN SHING and Others
  • CACC102/1995R. v. LAI FOR-SHUN and Another
  • CACC102/1996R. v. CHOI MAN HAY
  • CACC103/1994CHAN KWOK-HING v. R.
  • CACC103/1996R. v. FUNG CHI SHING and Another
6051-EN-1995-05-12

R. v. CHAN CHI HING

HTML content

CACC000620/1994

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL

1994, No. 620
(Criminal)

___________

 

BETWEEN
THE QUEEN
AND
CHAN CHI HING

___________

 

Coram: Hon Power, Ag. C.J. and Litton, V.-P. in Court

Date of hearing: 12 May 1995

Date of judgment: 12 May 1995

________________

J U D G M E N T

________________

Litton, V.-P. (giving the judgment of the Court):

1. The applicant Chan Chi-hing seeks leave to appeal against a sentence of two years and nine months' imprisonment imposed by His Honour Judge Kilgour in the District Court in November 1994. The applicant was originally charged with two others and he pleaded not guilty to the charge of burglary. On the second day of trial and realising that the 2nd accused was likely to testify against him he changed his plea and pleaded guilty to the charge.

2. The burglary occurred on 29 November 1993 at the offices of Peregrine Brokerage Limited located in New World Tower, Queen's Road Central. A large number of scripts of a public company was stolen. The 2nd accused was the mastermind of the plot. The applicant and the 2nd accused were former employees of the brokerage company concerned. The applicant at the date of his conviction was 22 years old and had a clear record.

3. The judge took as his starting point three years nine months' imprisonment and discounted it to two years and nine months having regard to the circumstances, including the fact that the applicant had received a share of the proceeds of the sale of the stolen shares. The applicant had a supporting family, a fact which the judge in sentencing him took into account.

4. In our judgment the sentence of two years nine months' imprisonment is not excessive nor has the judge erred in principle in sentencing. The application is dismissed.

(N.P. Power)(Henry Litton)
Ag. Chief JusticeVice President

Representation:

Ms M.A. Crabtree (Crown Prosecutor) for the Respondent

Applicant in person